What's Wrong With Jordan Peele's 'Twilight Zone' 2019 Reboot

Updated on June 17, 2019
TheGutterMonkey profile image

I'm Nevets: Nerd, cinephile, TV-junkie, bookworm, gamer, and slacker extraordinaire.

Submitted for our disapproval, The Twilight Zone

The much-anticipated return of The Twilight Zone is finally here, with a 2019 reboot hosted by the one and only Jordan Peele on the streaming service CBS All Access. It's a new take on an old masterpiece that, sadly, fails to live up to its predecessor in nearly every way.

The good news is that you won't be having to drop money on another streaming service at least (as if we needed another one of those anyway). The bad news, unfortunately, is that Rod Serling's beloved baby has grown up to be one of the most boring anthology series to ever hit television screens. Take it from me, I've seen a lot of them.

Where did they go wrong? What missteps were made? Well, that's what we're going to delve into today.

Jordan Peele as host

As host of this new incarnation of The Twilight Zone, Peele, to my opinion, often comes across as a bit of a poser (excuse my 90's-kid lingo).

Rod Serling was something special. He not only personally wrote over 60% of the classic Twilight Zone episodes (thus giving more weight to him delivering the shows intro and outros), but he wasn't putting on much of a show with his personality when he acted as the narrator. What you saw, was who he was. Listen to an interview with him, for instance, and you quickly see that the guy who you're hearing on the show sounds just like the guy he was in real life; same demeanor, same personality, same gravitas, and same intellect. Peele, on the other hand, seems to simply be doing a Rod Serling impression.

While he doesn't try and mimic Serling's face, chain-smoking, or exact voice (as an SNL comedian would, for instance), he does attempt to adopt Serling's natural depth, cadence, and weightiness. It's an understandable thing to do, of course, as everything from the original series, to The Outer Limits, and Unsolved Mysteries did the same with great effectiveness. But the difference here is that we all know who Peele is and have seen his personality at play. And what we're seeing on this show is not Peele (a fact that's particularly highlighted in the meta season one finale, where Peele breaks character, changing from an ominous mysterious narrator, to the modern, slang-using funnyman we're used to). The end result is that his role as the narrator doesn't feel real or organic. And, more often than not, his intros felt more like the beginning of a Twilight Zone parody rather than an actual episode.

Serling was the dour narrator and mastermind. Peele is an actor putting on a false show of eerie all-knowingness. And it's an evident enough fact that, for me, at least, snaps my suspension of disbelief in half whenever he's on screen.

A lack of twist endings

As everyone knows, one of the most defining aspects of The Twilight Zone was it's iconic twist endings. They were always clever, surprising, and ironic. And one appeared at the end of almost every episode. Most of us, upon our first viewing of the show, quickly grew to expect them with every episode and almost always tried to predict what the next one was going to be. But, regardless of how much you knew a twist was coming, they still seemed to catch you off guard when they finally arrived. It was fun, exciting, and one of the core things that made The Twilight Zone the memorable classic that it became. In fact, it's one of the things that made The Twilight Zone The Twilight Zone.

Today, the closest show to achieve anything similar to this effect is the hit Netflix series, Black Mirror (which does so beautifully). And when it was announced that a new Twilight Zone was hitting the scene, many of us naturally assumed, whether the product as a whole was good or bad, there'd at least be a new twisty-turny show in town. Sadly, however, the reboot has appeared to do away with the originals classic tradition all together.

After watching its first 11-episodes, I can only recall two twist endings that caught my attention; or had any real twist at all. One being the aforementioned feminist episode (Not All Me), the other being about a crew of astronauts who may not be as stranded and alone in space as they think they are (Six Degrees of Freedom, which, for my money, is the only episode of this season that's even halfway worth a watch). While neither of these endings was jaw-dropping (or particularly good), at least they were an attempt. Which is more than what the rest of the episodes did.

The episodes are too long

Welcome to an episode devoid of pace and as infinite of time
Welcome to an episode devoid of pace and as infinite of time

In 1962, right before the original Twilight Zone's fourth season, CBS demanded that each episode of the 30-minute-long series be stretched out to an hour in order to fill a timeslot left open by a recently canceled program. It wasn't a decision in which the man himself, Rod Serling, was particularly happy about.

"Ours is the perfect half-hour show... If we went to an hour, we'd have to fleshen our stories, soap opera style. Viewers could watch fifteen minutes without knowing whether they were in a Twilight Zone or Desilu Playhouse," — Rod Serling

While this decision didn't completely ruin the season, the overlong episodes had undeniable problems in pacing. And it made even its best episodes have a very un-Twilight Zone feel to them. While most of the season turned out pretty good, for Twilight Zone episodes, they were some of the biggest and most forgettable duds in the bunch.

Cut to over half a century later, and CBS still hasn't learned its lesson.

Each episode of 2019's Twilight Zone is well over that old half-hour runtime; and, without great writers such as Serling, Charles Beaumont, and Richard Matheson at the helm, the pacing is more tedious than ever. The shortest of these new episodes were two that were 37 minutes in length, with the rest totaling to about 45 to 55 minutes apiece.

While these long runtimes may work fairly well for an anomaly like Black Mirror (which feels more like short films than long episodes), for whatever reason, it doesn't work here. You get the point of each episode very quickly and it then begins to feel like we're just biding our time, watching filler, while awaiting a twist that never comes.

Heavy on social messages, light on clever storytelling

Wonder what they're trying to say with this one?
Wonder what they're trying to say with this one?

In this new incarnation of The Twilight Zone, we're slapped in the face with social commentary at every turn. It's blatant, ham-fisted, in-your-face, and on the nose. Worst of all? This spread of messages appears to take priority over the actual stories the messages are being conveyed through. Almost as if the writers began with a talking point and were told to quickly cobble together a plot after the fact.

Whether we agree with the messages or not, this type of writing doesn't lend itself too well to entertainment. It's a creative process more along the lines of old-time propaganda films like Reefer Madness, or those cheesy educational programs they'd show us in school, where they tried to mask learning about math in some lazily written premise about child detectives. Whether the agenda is good or bad, you can smell it at every turn. You could see too clearly what they were doing, and it would destroy any suspension of disbelief you could muster. It's as if they just want to get a message across, with little-to-no care as to whether it's a good watch.

The biggest examples include the Groundhog Day-esque racism episode, which focuses on a black mother and her son being repeatedly pulled over by a racist white cop. We have the feminist episode, which teaches us that all men have violent, sexist urges inside them and must choose to be better (no, I'm not exaggerating). The immigration episode, where a white woman from a parallel dimension is detained in our dimension for being here illegally. Then, of course, there's the episode about the a-hole little boy who becomes president; I haven't quite put my finger on what that one could be alluding to.

The on-the-nose quality of it became eye-roll inducing very quickly. Typically, it's only a few minutes into an episode when you see what the angle is. And while I didn't always necessarily disagree with the core messages they were trying to convey, there was no mistaking the amateurishness of their delivery. There was nothing new or particularly insightful that they were trying to say. And it was never being said in a subtle or unique way that would make you think about the topics any differently than you otherwise would. Unlike something such as Black Mirror, for example, which will make you look at social media and technology from an angle you've likely never thought of before, the new Twilight Zone simply rehashes the same tired old tropes, cliche's, stereotypes, and topics we've heard time and again.

While the original Twilight Zone was rich with deep social and political commentary, those were never what lured the fans in and kept them glued to their seats. And they never beat us over the head with them either. Its messages were a medicine hidden subtly, deep within the show's subtext, made to taste palatable by how well it was masked in an entertaining story. Typically, you wouldn't even realize there was a message until after it was too late. Because medicine that tastes good is a medicine that people will take. It's a medicine that's effective. 2019's Twilight Zone, however, is a medicine that tastes like medicine.

Too much good competition

A bad time for a bad show
A bad time for a bad show

Other than the 1960's Twilight Zone series, one of the biggest comparisons typically made against this series (or any current sci-fi/horror anthology series) is with Netflix's Black Mirror. Which, in many peoples opinions and reviews over the years, has already been classified as the true spiritual heir to The Twilight Zone. It's innovative, thought-provoking, scary, clever, keeps you guessing, typically has surprising twist endings, and hidden within each episode is a unique take and new angle on the cultural perception and direction of technology and social media.

With a show like this already in existence, and already being compared to the Rod Serling masterpiece, it makes it difficult for audiences to settle for much less when something new comes along. Especially when that new thing is an actual Twilight Zone-named series, where expectations are high to begin with.

Alas, however, the new Twilight Zone not only fails to live up to its origin series or its spiritual successor, but even other new and lesser shows, such as Amazon's Philip K. Dick's Electric Dreams, surpass it in every way. Perhaps a few years back, when there was little-to-no competition, you could get away with a less-entertaining anthology series. Today, however, you really need to step up your game. And this series just wasn't up to the task.

A big name to live up to

A poor attempt at filling the shoes of a legend
A poor attempt at filling the shoes of a legend

Perhaps the biggest obstacle this reboot had to overcome was the gigantic shoes it had to fill.

Rod Serling's original Twilight Zone is a classic in both television history and science fiction history, in general. In its short 5 seasons, it gave us one episode after another that's left a lasting impact in our cultural memories, sparked our imaginations, and grown to a higher and higher legendary status with each passing year. Its impact is so large that even those unfamiliar with the show know what someone means when they say they feel like they're in The Twilight Zone. It's just that ingrained in our collective minds.

So if any show comes along with the intention of using and profiting off its powerful title, that show best be sure it can withstand the comparisons and expectations that come with it. You can't half-ass it if you dare call yourself The Twilight Zone.

Living up to this name wouldn't be an easy feat even for the best of shows. Let alone one such as this, which would be a difficult watch even if it weren't trying to stick out and be seen from under such an enormous shadow. Especially when there's so many better alternatives out there.

Questions & Answers

    © 2019 The Gutter Monkey

    Comments

      0 of 8192 characters used
      Post Comment

      No comments yet.

      working

      This website uses cookies

      As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, reelrundown.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

      For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://reelrundown.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

      Show Details
      Necessary
      HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
      LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
      Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
      AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
      Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
      CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
      Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
      Features
      Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
      Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
      Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
      Marketing
      Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
      Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
      Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
      Statistics
      Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
      ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
      ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)