Why the "Jumanji" Sequels Don't Hold Up to the Original

Updated on December 16, 2019
Alec Zander profile image

Nathan is a film critic and aspiring author with a true passion for the film industry & hopes his writings will help launch his careers.

People seem to be swept up in the fantasy of Jumanji. The 2017 film was a surprise hit, raking in a global total of $962.1 million, just shy of the $1 billion mark. The new film, titled The Next Level, is sure to be a hit too. Whether it will be as big of a success remains to be seen, but it's sure to be profitable.

Why is it, though, that people seem to have forgotten what a treasure the original film was? Jumanji, starring Robin Williams and a very young Kirsten Dunst, was successful for its time, raking in $262.8 million globally. Regardless of the profit difference, the sequels will never hold a candle to the original, and I aim to explain why.

Let's look first at the biggest problem with the sequels: continuity. In the original, we're introduced to a board game which has a life of its own. It can even trap you inside itself until another player rolls a 5 or an 8. Now, when Allan Parrish (Willaims' character) is freed from the game after 26 years, he's a changed man. He's been living in the jungle all this time, hunting to survive and being hunted by horrifying things. Allan was so terrified by Jumanji that he was frightened by the very sight of the game. We were treated to all manner of terrors throughout the film, from a giant carnivorous plant to a monsoon with a crocodile, to quicksand and horrific spiders. The game even summoned a stampede of rhinos and a lion which Allan had to face off with in order to save Peter and Judy. Not to mention the greatest threat of all: the hunter Van Pelt. Fast forward to 2017. We don't get any of that in the sequels. What we get instead is tame compared to the original.

The continuity is broken in so many different ways. First of all, the game changes itself into a video game. Okay, so I know the game is magic but is it really that powerful? It can really will itself into a different form of existence? In rewriting itself, the game changed to become more like how a video game is. You get three "lives", three chances to finish the game. In the original, it was do or die. You had one shot and that was it. If you died then Jumanji never stopped until another player came along and that same chance was given to them. The sequels destroy everything the original set up in favor of a more comedic approach. To me, this absolutely ruins the spirit of Jumanji. It's supposed to be serious, frightening, and a little nightmarish. When you see the sequels, you can't help but wonder what Allan was so afraid of. You don't see the horrors that he saw. You see a bunch of silliness.

The next big difference is the cast. Now, I do enjoy the cast of the new ones but let's first consider what a feat the original accomplished. You had one big name: Robin Williams. He was the money maker. Then you had Bonnie Hunt. She had Rain Man, two Beethoven movies, and a romantic comedy alongside Robert Downey Jr called Only You under her belt. She was a big name but certainly not as big as Robin. Kirsten Dunst was relatively unknown aside from her role as Claudia in Interview with the Vampire. Bradley Pierce was also relatively unknown, aside from voicing Chip in Beauty and the Beast and portraying Sydney Chaplin Jr in Chaplin. My point is, the original film took risks. It didn't rely on star-power to make money but rather story and a lot of heart. The sequels, however, went the opposite direction. Dwayne Johnson, Kevin Hart, Jack Black, and Karen Gillan are all very well-known stars, which is first and foremost what drew people in to see the film in the first place. Throw in a lot of comedy and some brainless story and there you have it - instant money with an inevitable follow-up.

The third and final major issue is the message. The original, as serious as it was, had several great messages, the first of which was friends always stick together and will always have your back. The second was cheating has consequences. Sure, you probably won't be cursed and turn into a monkey but there's consequences all the same. The sequels don't have those messages. While the sequels focus on a group of friends, there's no heart in them. The original Jumanji had you facing these terrors yourself. The sequels have you embody someone else. You're not learning anything by embodying a character. In the 2019 film, Spencer actively chooses to return to Jumanji just so he can feel what it was like to be Dr. Bravestone again. He didn't learn anything or grow as a person.

In conclusion, sadly, it seems that people don't care about messages or growth anymore. They just want to be entertained. They don't care about meaning or substance. Being able to go into a film and not think much can be a good thing, but when you're destroying a legacy in the process, that's a travesty.

© 2019 Nathan Jasper


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, reelrundown.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)