Movie Review: “Wakefield”

Updated on December 11, 2018
Movie Beasts profile image

There are many movies that are worth seeing, but there are a lot of stinkers as well. My goal here is to weed out the good from the bad.

Wakefield

Theatrical Release: 5/19/2017
Theatrical Release: 5/19/2017 | Source

Synopsis

Howard Wakefield (Bryan Cranston) is sick of his mundane life. He is sick of his ordinary job and sick of his ordinary suburban life. Late one night, Howard takes the train home from work. When he gets to his house, he looks in at his wife preparing dinner and decides he cannot take it anymore. He decides to hide out in the attic of his garage to spy on his family for awhile longer.

The next morning, Howard wakes up to find he had fallen asleep in the attic of the garage. His family is worried and Howard cannot think of a lie to justify where he had been. The next decision he makes ends up having drastic changes on his life. He decides to continue hiding out in the attic of the garage for several months, spying on his family and learning what they do when he is not around. The longer he keeps this up, however, the more he may be risking his relationship with his family.

Official Trailer

The Pros & Cons

The Pros
 
Bryan Cranston (+10pts)
Diana Wakefield (-6pts)
The Premise (+3pts)
The Motivations (-8pts)
Unpredictable (+3pts)
The End (-6pts)
All movies start with an average score of 75pts, points are then added or subtracted based on each Pro and Con. Each Pro or Con is designated points, ranging from 0-10, to convey how significant these Pros or Cons are.
Source

Pro: Bryan Cranston (+10pts)

By far, the best part of this movie was Bryan Cranston. He makes this movie watchable, which is saying something when you consider how slowly paced the movie is. A lot of this movie consists of Howard watching his family with Bryan Cranston narrating the character’s thoughts. It is not a very eventful story, but Bryan Cranston’s performance kept me watching.

Howard is messed up. Sometimes it is comical, and sometimes it is very dark, but Bryan Cranston does a great job of balancing the two in a compelling way. I do not know how many other actors could have done so, but Bryan Cranston was able to pull off this role. This is a dark, slow story with a weird premise, but Bryan Cranston was both entertaining and captivating.

Source

Con: Diana Wakefield (-6pts)

My issue was not so much with Jennifer Garner herself, but I did not buy the relationship between her character and Howard. I just did not buy that her and Bryan Cranston were husband and wife, and I know that the blame for this falls on the shoulders of many. The casting director, the film’s director, Jennifer Garner, Bryan Cranston, and the writers were all partially at fault here. I just did not feel the chemistry between the two characters.

Unfortunately, this causes a big problem for the story. In order to really care about what Howard was doing, we as an audience needed to care about the marriage between these two characters. Due to not caring about the relationship, it did not feel like there was much at stake in the story. I just did not feel like there was enough chemistry between the two actors, the director failed to see it, the writers did not give the actors much to work with, and the actors failed to make it work. The relationship between the two main characters really just failed on every level.

Source

Pro: The Premise (+3pts)

The premise for this movie is ridiculous, but it is interesting. A man is so sick with his mundane life that he decides to fake his own disappearance so that he can spy on his family from the attic of his garage for several months. The premise is so interesting because there is just so much going on there. This is a very bizarre situation and I was intrigued to explore what leads to the main character’s actions.

What would lead a man to go to such extreme lengths? Was Howard sane to begin with or did he already have some issues? Just how mundane was his life? Does he even love his family? The premise raises so many questions which made me watch the movie. The premise achieved its goal, I just wish the execution was better.

Source

Con: The Motivation (-8pts)

While I was fascinated by the film’s premise, I felt that the filmmakers did a poor job of answering most of the questions raised by said premise. Most importantly, the filmmakers did a poor job of explaining why Howard is doing what he is doing and what lead to him doing it. The majority of the film’s runtime is spent not knowing the answers to these questions. This leaves the audience curious, but it also makes his actions feel less impactful because we, the audience, are not entirely on his side yet.

This is made even worse when they inevitably explain Howard and Diana’s relationship further. Before this, audiences really only care about Howard because no other character gets any real development. Then, when the filmmakers reveal something about the characters’ marriage, it will end up weirding the audience out. Rather than shock the audience, what this does is take the audience from: only caring about Howard to only caring about Howard but caring about him less. The whole thing was a mess and gave me the impression that the filmmakers had an interesting premise, but had no idea about where they wanted to take it.

Source

Pro: Unpredictable (+3pts)

There was somewhat of a bright side to the filmmakers not knowing where they wanted to take the premise. The bright side was that the audience also will not know where the filmmakers are taking the premise. Knowing the premise, we know that Howard is a guy who will do things most people would not. Throughout this story, Howard goes to some extreme places in order to survive in the garage for several months without being noticed.

Does he clean himself? What does he eat? Howard does things that will definitely catch audiences off guard and will leave them wondering what crazy thing he will do next. It is certainly not enough to distract audiences from the movie’s problems, but it creates some mildly entertaining moments, and I will praise Bryan Cranston again by saying he was very entertaining to see in those situations.

Source

Con: The End (-6pts)

The main cause for me not liking the motivations of Howard was that it did not seem like the filmmakers knew where they wanted to go with the character and with the premise. The same was true with the overall ending of the movie. I am not going to spoil anything here, but the ending was severely unsatisfying. The filmmakers clearly had no idea where they were going with this story and it showed.

There was so much build up for the character of Howard. For the majority of the movie, audiences will be wondering how (or if) he will be able to get out of his situation. Unfortunately, the writers clearly had the same dilemma. The movie builds up and builds up, then kind of just ends in one of the least satisfying ways. This story should serve as a lesson to the filmmakers, if you are going to start making a movie, you should maybe have an idea of how that story ends.

Grading Scale

Grade
Category
Points
A+
Amazing
95-100
A-
Great
90-94
B+
Good
85-89
B-
Decent
80-84
C+
Average
75-79
C-
Watchable
70-74
D+
Bad
65-69
D-
Terrible
60-64
F
Garbage
45-59
Source

Grade: C- (71pts)

Wakefield is a movie with an interesting premise and a very talented main actor. After that, there was not much to this movie. The premise was so interesting because it was all about a man doing something extreme. It intrigued audiences by making them wonder what could take a man so far. The setup was compelling and Bryan Cranston gave his all to this role. The movie had some major problems, but Bryan Cranston’s performance made the movie watchable.

The movie’s problems all seemed to stem from one overarching issue, the filmmakers had no idea where they were going with the story. They either did not give answers to important questions or they answered them in a very unsatisfying way. The filmmakers had a premise, but they did not seem to have a plan on where they wanted to take it. The motivations of the main character and the ending of the movie suffered for this mistake. Bryan Cranston made the movie tolerable, but the movie was far from good.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, reelrundown.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://reelrundown.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)