Should I Watch..? 'Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace'

Updated on April 30, 2020
Benjamin Cox profile image

Benjamin has been reviewing films for sixteen years and has seen more action movies than he should probably admit to!

Film's poster
Film's poster | Source

What's the big deal?

Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (often just known as The Phantom Menace) is an action sci-fi adventure movie released in 1999 and is the first of a prequel trilogy to director George Lucas' original Star Wars films. Believing that special effects in movies had finally caught up with his vision for a fourth film, Lucas began filming back in 1997 fourteen years after the release of Return Of The Jedi. The film stars Liam Neeson, Ewan McGregor, Samuel L Jackson, Natalie Portman, Jake Lloyd and Ray Park and follows the initial discovery of Anakin Skywalker and his first meeting with his future Jedi Master Obi-Wan Kenobi. Despite mixed reviews, the movie was a huge success with global anticipation at fever pitch. After a conversation into 3D and subsequent re-release, the film's worldwide takings topped $1 billion which makes it the most financially successful entry in the Star Wars series so far. It would be followed by Attack Of The Clones in 2002 and Revenge Of The Sith in 2005.


3 stars for Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace

What's it about?

In the days of the Old Republic, a trade disagreement between the Trade Federation and the peaceful world of Naboo threatens to escalate. The Senate dispatches two Jedi knights to negotiate a settlement - Qui-Gon Jinn and his apprentice Obi-Wan Kenobi - but the blockade around the planet masks the true intentions of the Trade Federation, a full-scale military invasion. Escaping to the planet's surface, Qui-Gon initially tries to warn the local amphibian Gungans to fight back but to no avail. However, they do manage to rescue ruler of the Naboo people Queen Amidala and just about manage to escape the blockade as well.

Forced into landing on the remote desert world of Tattooine, Qui-Gon encounters a young boy who is unusually gifted in the ways of the Force. Believing young Anakin to be the one spoken about in Jedi prophecies, Qui-Gon attempts to introduce Anakin to their way of life. But as the Trade Federation's droid army gathers on the planet of Naboo, is time running out on Naboo and what power, if any, does young Anakin really possess?


Main Cast

Liam Neeson
Qui-Gon Jinn
Ewan McGregor
Obi-Wan Kenobi
Natalie Portman
Queen Padmé Amidala
Jake Lloyd
Anakin Skywaler
Ian McDiarmid
Senator Palpatine
Ahmed Best
Jar Jar Binks (motion capture & voice)
Ray Park
Darth Maul *
Frank Oz
Yoda (voice)
* dubbed by Peter Serafinowicz

Technical Info

George Lucas
George Lucas
Running Time
136 minutes
Release Date (UK)
16th July, 1999
Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi
Academy Award Nominations
Best Sound, Best Sound Effects Editing, Best Visual Effects
Razzie Award
Worst Supporting Actor (Best)
Razzie Award Nominations
Worst Picture, Worst Screen Couple (Lloyd & Portman), Worst Supporting Actor (Lloyd), Worst Supporting Actress (Sofia Coppola), Worst Director, Worst Screenplay
The film is not a complete waste of time, despite the presence of cinema's most hated character of all time (right)...
The film is not a complete waste of time, despite the presence of cinema's most hated character of all time (right)... | Source

What's to like?

There's little point in denying that The Phantom Menace does indeed drop the ball on numerous occasions. But it also has a number of aces up its sleeve as well and those who consider it fashionable to pour scour on this much maligned entry in the Star Wars saga would do well to remember them. Darth Maul is an enthralling and intriguing addition to the film's collection of villains - despite the lack of dialogue, the moment he lights up the double-ended light-sabre is one of the most iconic images in recent years. It's also very cool indeed.

It's easy to overlook the quality of the CG with the brilliantly rendered world of Naboo or the vast droid army amassing to destroy it. Certainly, it's harder to forgive it for allowing Lucas to inflict the least liked character in cinema history on audiences but still... As for the human cast, Neeson's impassive calmness is well utilised as Obi-Wan's mentor while McGregor himself is restricted to playing Robin to Neeson's Batman. Finally, the film has arguably one of the most thrilling sequences in the series in the hyperkinetic Pod Race on Tattooine. Recalling the same audience reaction during the final approach on the Death Star in the very first Star Wars film A New Hope, Lucas revisits the scenario with amazing visuals and gripping action. On a bigger screen, it's mightily impressive stuff and personally, it's the best non-violent action sequence in the entire series.

Fun Facts

  • McGregor has admitted that during filming, he made light-sabre noises as he duelled. This was later pointed out to him that the noises were edited in afterwards and indeed, this was done in post production.
  • The film has only one shot with no CG effects in at all - the shot of the dioxis gas pouring through the vent in the meeting room. Sets were built only as tall as the actors themselves as the rest would appear in CG later. Neeson was so tall that he cost the set builders an additional $150'000.
  • The communicator device that Qui-Gon uses is actually a redecorated Sensor Excel razor for women.

What's not to like?

The story, if we're honest, isn't the strongest and feels bogged down by Lucas' typical ineptitude when it comes to writing dialogue. I mean, Obi-Wan is on screen for mere seconds before saying he has a bad feeling about this. I know what he means - the film's large cast of CG characters are actually not that convincing - the Gungans might have been more interesting were it not for You-Know-Who while the alien leaders of the Trade Federation lacked any sort of definition or identity. The human cast aren't much better - McGregor, Lloyd and Portman are massive disappointments considering their importance to the series but I'm willing to let that go in the face of such a weak script.

What I cannot forgive, and neither can millions of others, is Ahmed Best's intensely irritating performance as Jar Jar Binks. Binks, who serves no real purpose other than to inject some goofy humour for children under the age of 10, is widely acknowledged as the worst character in the Star Wars saga and possibly the worst in all of cinema history. Best's vocal talents are pretty thin on this evidence, with dialogue being lost in a heavy Caribbean accent and odd guttural noises. Remember that feeling of anger you got when you figured out that the Ewoks were only inserted into Return Of The Jedi to appeal to kids and to sell merchandise? Multiply it by a hundred.

The other thing I disliked was the endless references to the original trilogy. Yes, I understand that this has to set everything up so of course, there'll be some crossing over of material. But what should have been a trickle ends up being a flood - take the appearance of C-3PO alongside his trusty companion R2-D2. Not only it is largely unnecessary but the surprise discovery of C-3PO's creator goes against the entire grain of the saga, turning this fantastical space epic into a futuristic soap opera. Frankly, I couldn't decide whether I was more upset about that or about that damned Gungan.

There's no denying that Darth Maul is one of the most intriguing characters in the franchise...
There's no denying that Darth Maul is one of the most intriguing characters in the franchise... | Source

Should I watch it?

For anyone new to the series, it's a serviceable entry into the saga. It's nowhere near as accomplished as the three original films and despite many claims otherwise, it also isn't the worst film in the series. The Phantom Menace has the feel of a director finding his feet again, which is exactly what Lucas was doing as he'd not directed a film since 1977. It's a work-in-progress, an unsightly mess of ideas thrown onto a screen to see what sticks. Not everything works but for anyone who missed the originals, it's perfectly acceptable entertainment.

Great For: very young children, toy shops, CG enthusiasts

Not So Great For: die-hard fans of the original trilogy, cynics, child actors

What else should I watch?

It's not just grumpy old men like me for say that the originals were the best. A New Hope kicked off the entire saga back in 1977 and simultaneously invented the concept of the blockbuster movie. The Empire Strikes Back saw greater character development and one of the most infamous plot twists in film history while Return Of The Jedi is a crowd-pleasing composite of revelations, action and a truly satisfying conclusion.

The other two prequels are a bit of a mixed bag, to say the least. Attack Of The Clones is as joyless and dull as its title, swamped in excessive CG and not even improved by the appearance of Christopher Lee. Revenge Of The Sith is the best of the prequels, a dark and brooding tragedy marking the fall of the Jedi, the rise of the Sith and the fall from grace of young Anakin. But the film's still blanketed under a digital cloud and all three films lack the realism of the original three. Thank God for J.J. Abrams' brilliant return to traditional techniques and a more worn look in Star Wars: The Force Awakens, even if the story feels a tad familiar...

© 2015 Benjamin Cox

Soap Box

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)