Should I Watch..? 'Nosferatu'

Updated on February 21, 2019
Benjamin Cox profile image

Benjamin is a former volunteer DJ at his local hospital radio station. He has been reviewing films online for over fifteen years.

One poster design for the film
One poster design for the film | Source

What's the big deal?

Nosferatu: A Symphony Of Horror (also known simply as Nosferatu) is a silent horror film released in 1922 and is among one of the best known examples of German Expressionism. The film is an adaptation of Bram Stoker's novel Dracula but with several changes to character names and settings - nevertheless, it was close enough that Stoker's heirs sued the studio and won which resulted in Prana Films (the studio behind the film) going bankrupt after just one movie. As well as the financial settlement, all copies of the film were ordered to be destroyed but one copy had already been distributed around the world and it has since fallen into the public domain. The film stars Max Schreck, Gustav von Wangenheim, Greta Schröder and Alexander Granach and was directed by Friedrich W. Murnau. Reviews at the time focused on the occasionally suspect technical side of things but contemporary reviews are almost universally positive and today, the film is regarded as a masterpiece of mood and atmosphere.


3 stars for Nosferatu

What's it about?

In the German city of Wisborg in 1838, Thomas Hutter is asked by his employer Knock to journey to Transylvania to visit a new client - Count Orlok. Sending his wife Ellen to stay with his friend Harding and her sister Annie, Hutter journeys to the remote land where the locals become deeply concerned at the mere mention of Orlok's name. Despite being warned not to visit the Count, Hutter eventually arrives and meets with Orlok and the two have dinner.

Orlok's unusual behaviour starts to worry Hutter and he quickly concludes business, the purchasing of a house in Wisborg not far from Hutter's own home. After waking up the next day with bite marks on his neck, Hutter worries that Orlok could be a vampire and is powerless to stop the Count from heading to Germany to continue his reign of terror.

Trailer for the remastered edition from 2013

Main Cast

Max Schreck
Count Orlok
Gustav von Wangenheim
Thomas Hutter
Greta Schröder
Ellen Hutter
Alexander Granach
Georg H. Schnell
Shipowner Harding
Ruth Landshoff
John Gottowt
Professor Bulwer

Technical Info

F. W. Murnau
Henrik Galeen*
Running Time
94 minutes
Release Date (USA)
3rd June, 1929
Fantasy, Horror, Silent
*based on the novel 'Dracula' by Bram Stoker
Schreck's performance as Count Orlok is mesmeric underneath make-up and prosthetics that belies the film's age.
Schreck's performance as Count Orlok is mesmeric underneath make-up and prosthetics that belies the film's age. | Source

What's to like?

It's impossible to think of Nosferatu without bringing to mind that classic image of Orlok's silhouette, fingers and claws outstretched ready for the kill, silently climbing the stairs towards his sleeping victim. Of course, the film is much more than just one image but it's the image that stays with you afterwards, a simple one but mightily effective. It's actually indicative of the film as a whole. Bereft of the special effects and genre clichés we expect from a vampire film, the movie works hard to make the most out of what it can do and credit must be given for that.

Schreck is a revelation as Orlok. Buried beneath heavy makeup and prosthetics, he looks every inch the monster he is supposed to and not some well-groomed charmer like Bela Lugosi or Christopher Lee portrayed. It is impossible to escape the age of the film due to its obvious fragility - it almost feels like you are watching it via a projector and the film itself could collapse at any moment - but it's remarkable how ambitious the film is. Of course the acting is hammy because this is German Expressionism so it's supposed to be. But this doesn't stop the film from being creepy and unnerving. Not traditionally scary but it has a way of staying with you.

Fun Facts

  • The city of Wisborg is fictional but they shot several locations in Wismar and Lübeck. Most, if not all, of the medieval architecture shown in the film is still standing today.
  • Many of the scenes featuring Orlok outside his castle were filmed during the day, which is both problematic for Orlok considering his weakness for sunlight as well as the film-makers shooting in black-and-white. Later versions tinted these scenes blue to correct this oversight.
  • The 2000 film Shadow Of The Vampire is a fictionalised account of the making of this film, portraying the actor Schreck as an actual vampire. This might not be so far-fetched - Schreck himself was something of a loner with a strange sense of humour and enjoyed long walks through forests.

What's not to like?

Apart from the overall lack of scares, Nosferatu has not aged as well as Count Orlok himself. The Expressionist style of the film and screenplay means that every reaction is over-the-top and faintly silly with women fainting at the slightest provocation and eyebrows being raised at the drop of a hat. Of course, I understand that this was a popular style at the time of the film's production but it does considerably ease the amount of tension the film otherwise generates. This is possibly the most family-friendly horror film I think I've ever seen although younger children might be wise to keep away.

It's fitting that Schreck dominates the picture the way he does because he distracts you from the rest of the cast, who could be members of a local am-dram society for all I knew or cared. On a personal level, I don't recall much about the film's soundtrack other than the usual violin stirrings during Orlok's scenes. It doesn't feel as epic in scale as Fritz Lang's 1927 silent masterpiece Metropolis or as visually striking as 1920's The Cabinet Of Dr. Caligari, the other film most people think of when discussing German Expressionism. But Nosferatu has rightfully earned a place in the history of cinema, demonstrating the cinematic potential in Stoker's acclaimed novel (which is worth a read if you have the time) and setting the benchmark for vampire films for decades to come.

Unshackled by cliché and stereotype, the film establishes several important tropes of the vampire myth as well as this iconic image.
Unshackled by cliché and stereotype, the film establishes several important tropes of the vampire myth as well as this iconic image. | Source

Should I watch it?

Few people today are going to be as frightened of Nosferatu as its audiences way back when but nearly a century on, the film remains a fascinating watch. It's amazing to think how it all came together from a technical perspective and for fans of cinema history in general, it's an essential watch. Goths and vampire fans will always sing its praises but personally, it isn't as scary as it once was and is now more of an unsettling curiosity than a timeless fright-fest.

Great For: film historians, horror fans, Goths, horror film-makers

Not So Great For: very young children, copyright infringement, the blind

What else should I watch?

I don't know what it is about German Expressionism that lends it to the horror genre but many examples around that era tend to lean that way. In addition to The Cabinet Of Dr Caligari, you also have other classics like The Hands Of Orlac from 1924 and the 1920 horror film The Golem: How He Came Into The World. And although it isn't a silent film, Fritz Lang's M has continually grown in stature since its release and is now considered one of the best films in history.

Vampires have been appearing in cinema ever since the release of Nosferatu although Hollywood's first attempt at adapting 'Dracula' for the screen wouldn't appear until 1931 when Bela Lugosi appeared as the blood-sucking fiend. Christopher Lee, another actor closely associated with the role, first appeared as the Count in 1958's Dracula and would go on to appear in the role another seven times until 1973's The Satanic Rites Of Dracula. Today, vampires are almost ubiquitous in films and TV although the horror element often is replaced with comedy or even romance. I wonder what Stoker's heirs would make of that.

© 2018 Benjamin Cox

Soap Box

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • profile image

      Pat Mills 

      2 years ago from East Chicago, Indiana

      Thanks for clarifying. I had been under a different - and mistaken - impression for quite a while.

    • Benjamin Cox profile imageAUTHOR

      Benjamin Cox 

      2 years ago from Norfolk, UK

      Florence Stoker wasn't aware of the film until she received an anonymous letter from Berlin, detailing the film's lavish premier and a flyer claiming that the film was "freely adapted from Bram Stoker's 'Dracula'". The case wasn't settled until 1925 after Prana Films declared bankruptcy as a way of avoiding paying reparation to Stoker's widow. She did grant the rights to a stage version of the novel which debuted in Derby in 1924.

    • profile image

      Pat Mills 

      2 years ago from East Chicago, Indiana

      As I understand things, Stoker's estate was unwilling to let Murnau make a film version of Dracula, so he made his film instead. Of course, we know the Stoker estate eventually relented to the delight of generations of viewers.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)