Should I Watch..? 'Catwoman'

Updated on May 19, 2020
Benjamin Cox profile image

Benjamin has been reviewing films for sixteen years and has seen more action movies than he should probably admit to!

Promotional poster for the film
Promotional poster for the film | Source

What's the big deal?

Catwoman is an action superhero film released in 2004 and is loosely based on the DC Comics character of the same name. The project was originally announced as a spin-off from the Tim Burton-helmed Batman Returns but remained in development hell for a number of years after Michelle Pfeiffer, Ashley Judd and Nicole Kidman all passed on the role. The film concerns a new character played by Halle Berry who develops strange cat-like powers after being murdered by goons at her job at a cosmetics company. The film quickly became one of the biggest flops in recent years, failing to recoup its $100 million budget and earning Berry a Razzie award for Worst Actress, which she gamely accepted in person. It is generally considered one of the worst superhero films of all time.


1 star for Catwoman

What's it about?

Graphic designer Patience Phillips is a subservient worker at Hedare Beauty, working towards the release of a new product designed to reverse the signs of aging. But after visiting the production facility, she accidentally overhears a conversation between the wife of the company's owner Laurel Hedare and scientist Dr. Ivan Slavicky concerning apparent dangers related to the new product known as Beau-line. Sadly, Laurel's guards manage to find Patience and are ordered to kill her, drowning her in a conduit pipe before flushing her body out into the docks.

Weirdly, Patience is brought back to life by a mysterious Mau cat and brought to the attention of Ophelia Powers. She explains to Patience that Mau cats serve as messengers of the Egyptian goddess Bast and that Patience is now a 'catwoman', reborn with peculiar powers. Deciding to track down her killers to discover why she was murdered, Patience begins to stalk the night looking for answers while attracting the unwanted attention of the handsome Detective Tom Lone...


Main Cast

Halle Berry
Patience Phillips / Catwoman
Sharon Stone
Laurel Hedare
Benjamin Bratt
Det. Tom Lone
Lambert Wilson
George Hedare
Frances Conroy
Ophelia Powers
Peter Wingfield
Dr Ivan Slavicky
Alex Borstein

Technical Info

John D. Brancato, Michael Ferris & John Rogers *
Running Time
104 minutes
Release Date (UK)
13th August, 2004
Action, Superhero
Razzie Awards
Worst Picture, Worst Actress (Berry), Worst Director, Worst Screenplay
Razzie Award Nominations
Worst Supporting Actor (Wilson), Worst Supporting Actress (Stone), Worst Screen Couple (Berry with either Bratt or Stone)
* story by Theresa Rebeck, John D. Brancato & Michael Ferris, based on characters created by Bob Kane
Berry's costume is every bit as ridiculous as it is impractical.
Berry's costume is every bit as ridiculous as it is impractical. | Source

What's to like?

On paper, this has all the elements you'd expect from a superhero film - the initial set-up to demonstrate their mild-mannered everyday selves, the origin scene after some tragedy is introduced into their lives, a love interest too blind to spot the obvious truth about the hero's true identity and lots of CG-enhanced fight scenes. Catwoman has all of these things, even if none of them are interesting or even related to the Catwoman character we all know and love from Batman's universe.

At least the action scenes aren't too bad compared to the rest of the film, although they are heavily reliant on CG. In fact, even a shot of the city where this is set is CG when a helicopter shot of Anywhere, USA would have sufficed. It's the most pointless use of CG I've seen since Tommy Wiseau's hideous clunker The Room with its digital sky. If you're blessed with the ability to laugh at bad movies then you'll find this a real treat - dialogue is instantly forgettable, the plot is hopeless and performances are so wooden, I'm surprised that some crew member didn't varnish them between takes.

Fun Facts

  • Berry became the first actor to accept their Razzie award in person, turning up on stage with her Oscar that she won for Best Actress in Monster's Ball in her hand.
  • A total of forty-three cats were trained for use in the film, most of them coming from local rescue homes. One of them was adopted by Berry, an orange and white cat called Play Dough.
  • Berry's stunt double was the male Hawaiian actor Nito Larioza although Berry still attempted some stunts herself. One of them ended with crashing into stage equipment during a chase scene, which was serious enough to put her in hospital briefly.

What's not to like?

With a film as badly conceived and executed as this, it's difficult to know where to begin. The very concept is suspect from the start - we see Berry's eyes mutate before our own but other than receiving a personality transplant and constantly licking her hands, we have no idea how her life has changed. Even the costume looks ridiculous - a costume which was apparently just sitting in Patience's wardrobe despite the fact that she would never have worn anything so hopelessly slutty. Berry looks good in most things but in Catwoman, she looks like an extra from a dodgy off-Broadway version of Cats.

The rest of the cast aren't much better, although the most memorable cast member is Stone for being truly awful as the villain of the piece. I could explain her insane plot to you but I'll let you enjoy that laugh for yourselves. Other things to mock include the cheap-looking and mostly redundant CG, the lack of any sort of interest in the film's story and the extreme liberties taken with the character itself. Turning what was once a jokey anti-hero from the Batman mythos into some sort of historical legend is an utter betrayal of genuine fans of the Dark Knight who might watch this expecting their treasured Catwoman to be given her own movie. They won't be making it now, even after Anne Hathaway's decent stab at the character in The Dark Knight Rises. Such is the movie's toxicity that the character will probably never see a solo outing now. Thanks for nothing, Warner Bros.

Stone (left) is hilariously bad as the villain of the piece...
Stone (left) is hilariously bad as the villain of the piece... | Source

Should I watch it?

The only people who will get a kick from Catwoman are those lucky sorts who can enjoy bad movies, possibly by providing their own commentary in the style of Mystery Science Theatre 3000. Personally, I believe that this might be the worst attempt at a serious superhero film ever made - Jeez, even Ben Affleck's Daredevil had slightly more to recommend it than this. This is a mangy, flea-bitten, scruffy, smelly specimen that's only good to go to a rescue home where they'll quietly put it down.

Great For: sadists, leather fetishists, idiots, Razzie voters

Not So Great For: anyone looking for a actual Catwoman movie, grown-ups

What else should I watch?

As great as Hathaway was as Catwoman, people like me will forever associate the role with Michelle Pfeiffer's memorable portrayal in Batman Returns. Effortlessly stealing the limelight from Michael Keaton's dull Batman and Danny DeVito's repugnant Penguin, Pfeiffer's PVC-soaked supervillain remains the closest interpretation we're likely to see. It's every bit as good as Berry's was comical.

Superhero films can be a mixed bag for studios. Until Marvel's Cinematic Universe (MCU) came along to shake things up in 2008 with Iron Man, films like Daredevil and Elektra were dull and uninteresting and even not that close to the source material. Neither Fantastic Four and its pointless sequel weren't that fantastic, Spawn really did come from the depths of Hell and even Nicholas Cage couldn't save Ghost Rider. Watch yourself out there, folks!

© 2016 Benjamin Cox

Soap Box

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • Benjamin Cox profile imageAUTHOR

      Benjamin Cox 

      4 years ago from Norfolk, UK

      UK viewers are quite a way behind away...

    • profile image

      Pat Mills 

      4 years ago from East Chicago, Indiana

      Unfortunately, Fox has made viewers wait until the February sweeps for more Gotham. The network, though, does have to find ways to stretch 22-episode seasons from fall until spring.

    • Benjamin Cox profile imageAUTHOR

      Benjamin Cox 

      4 years ago from Norfolk, UK

      Interesting to see how far Bicondova's portrayal will be allowed to progress but I agree, she is the most interesting Catwoman on screen so far. Looking forward to seeing "Gotham" return - damn your mid-season breaks!

    • profile image

      Pat Mills 

      4 years ago from East Chicago, Indiana

      Catwoman definitely deserves the infamy it has received. Give me Pfeiffer, Hathaway, or Carmen Bicondova from Gotham any day for a more compelling performance as that character.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)