2019 Netflix Halloween Countdown: "Demonic"

Updated on October 31, 2019
Movie Beasts profile image

There are many movies that are worth seeing, but there are a lot of stinkers as well. My goal here is to weed out the good from the bad.

2019 Netflix Halloween Countdown

For my third annual Netflix Halloween Countdown, I will once again be watching and reviewing some of the spooky, scary, gory, chilling, and horror-themed movies on Netflix. With each review, I will be including an up-to-date table that ranks these movies from best to worst. If you are looking to get in the Halloween spirit, by watching some Halloween-style movies, then these articles are for you!


Home Video Release: 10/10/2017
Home Video Release: 10/10/2017 | Source


Detective Mark Lewis (Frank Grillo) arrives on scene at a house where suspicious activity has been reported. Once inside, he finds a horrific scene of dead young men and women, but there is one survivor among the carnage. John (Dustin Milligan) is the only survivor at the scene so he quickly becomes Detective Lewis’ prime suspect. John is in shock and Detective Lewis has no evidence to support his hunch, but when John tells the authorites who was with him in the house, the authorities learn that a young woman is not accounted for.

John’s girlfriend, Michelle (Cody Horn) was not among the dead, so she just may still be alive. There is not evidence to justify arresting John, and there is a chance that he is innocent and in shock, but Michelle (wherever she is) may not have much time. Detective Lewis contacts his wife, Dr. Elizabeth Klein (Maria Bello), a psychologist, so that John can walk her through the events leading up to the horrific scene. The hope is that John would tell them what happened, and where Michelle is, while Dr. Klein tries to determine his innocence. However, everyone’s night becomes stranger when John tells the authorities that the young men and women went to the house to summon ghosts.

Official Trailer

The Pros & Cons

The Pros
The Cons
The Mystery (+10pts)
Character Development (-8pts)
Frank Grillo & Maria Bello (+3pts)
Leaping to Conclusions (-4pts)
Timeline Balance (+3pts)
Flashback Storyline (-5pts)
All movies start with an average score of 75pts, points are then awarded for each Pro and taken away for each Con. Each Pro or Con is designated points ranging from 0-10 allowing me to convey to you how significant these Pros or Cons are.

Pro: The Mystery (+10pts)

One element I did not expect to find in this film was the mystery. The film focuses on John as he tells the story of the events that took place in the house. It is then up to the authorities to determine if this kid's demonic story is true, if an unidentified killer was behind it, or if the John himself was the one responsible. If this movie played out, chronologically, it would have felt like a very typical, generic horror movie.

By structuring the film as they did, the filmmakers gave it a unique investigative mystery. As John tells his story, audiences will learn more about the events leading up to the tragedy, and will continuously go back and forth on their belief in John’s innocence. Part of this back and forth comes from Dustin Milligan’s (the actor who played John) performance, but it mainly comes from good story telling. At first, audiences will believe in the innocent, lucky, lone-survivor. Then audiences will be skeptical due to developments in the story. After that, audiences will believe he is being unjustifiably accused by Detective Lewis. The filmmakers then continue to play with what the audiences belief and the climax ends up working well. Demonic certainly has its issues, but the mystery element was executed masterfully by the filmmakers.


Con: Character Development (-8pts)

I thought there were some interesting character relationships in this film, but I thought the movie did a poor job of developing those characters and their relationships together. For example, I enjoyed the characters that Frank Grillo and Maria Bello played and I liked the husband-wife dynamic, but the movie did not really go anywhere with that. Then there were the young adults who went into the house. Michelle is dating John but one of the young men is her ex-boyfriend. This adds a bit of tension but the filmmakers never explore it. There are a few quick comments, but we never see it have any impact on the story.

Demonic does not develop any of its characters well. It just sets up the characters and focuses on the events of the film without showing any growth or change in the characters that experience those events. The potential for interesting character relationships were there, but the filmmakers failed to execute the development of those relationships. What we got was a cast full of generic, underdeveloped, characters (most of which were just bodies to be killed). As a result, audiences will not be very invested in what is happening on-screen because they will not care about the characters.


Pro: Frank Grillo & Maria Bello (+3pts)

Frank Grillo and Maria Bello definitely made this film more interesting. Neither give an outstanding performance, but they give the film necessary screen chemistry that makes the film watchable. Most of the rest of the cast was filled with generic and forgettable performances, but these two had a dynamic that was interesting to watch. Their relationship was an unexpected strength of this movie, due to its unique nature.

They are husband and wife, and they work together on criminal investigations. He is the detective, while she handles the psychological profile. They are a duo that seem to have seen their fair share of investigations, but this one may be their most challenging. I had not heard anything of this movie so I was expecting a generic horror film with generic characters, but I was pleasantly surprised to see these two actors and their unique relationship.


Con: Leaping to Conclusions (-4pts)

I liked that the film tried something different by making a demonic possession film from the perspective of a police investigation. We have seen too many generic demonic possession movies, but seeing it from a non-believer and police officer gave this movie a unique tone. The approach is very much like an episode from a cop procedural and, while the characters are unaware, the audience knows there is a supernatural element. In order to do this, the story follows two timelines simultaneously. Unfortunately, while the film balanced the timelines well, it struggled to move the investigation along in a natural way.

In order to squeeze in both timelines, the filmmakers had Frank Grillo's character to jump to huge conclusions that he could not possibly know. They did this so that they could keep the story moving without spending much time showing him getting to these conclusions naturally. He basically gets a clue, then adds a whole story to that clue with know way of knowing if there is any truth to his assumptions. The possibilities are endless when it comes to the events that led to each clue and there is no way of knowing what happened without a long investigation, yet Frank Grillo's character picks one possibility then goes with it with complete certainty. I get that the filmmakers needed to move this story along, but this was just lazy writing.


Pro: Timeline Balance (+3pts)

As I mentioned before, this film centers around a young man's recollection, to the police, of the horrors that took place within the house. As the young man is recalling the events, the audience gets to see the scenes as flashbacks. I thought the film did a fantastic job of balancing these two timelines while maintaining the mystery element through both. We are getting flashbacks, sure, but we are only learning things as Frank Grillo and Maria Bello's characters learn them.

Whenever a film attempts to balance two timelines, it runs the risk of plot issues. Luckily, this film was able to balance these timelines successfully while maintaining the desired tone. The film struggled a bit (as mentioned before) to properly develop the investigation, as Detective Lewis jumped to conclusions like crazy, but the mystery element remained constant. This was pretty entertaining and, while I would have given a bit more focus on the investigation and less of the flashbacks, I thought the filmmakers did a very good job of balancing these timelines.


Con: Flashback Storyline (-5pts)

This film had an interesting take on a demonic film, but the plot left a lot to be desired. The plot of this film just does not do anything special. It has a unique premise but still ends up feeling generic. The scares are mostly jump scares, the characters are one-dimensional, and the story does not go for anything with weight. The plot is not bad, it is just bland.

We have a group of generic young adults who have a fascination with the occult. They chase houses and locations with alleged demonic presences and they perform rituals to summon whatever is supposedly there. What could go wrong? I thought the investigation storyline worked to a degree, but the flashback storyline was pretty weak. This was a shame because, if the flashback storyline had worked, the investigation storyline could have been incredibly impactful. By not caring about the young adult characters or their storyline, we (as an audience) cannot be very invested in the investigation.

Grading Scale


Grade: C- (74pts)

Demonic is your typical demonic possession movie, but with a slight twist. There are a bunch of severely underdeveloped young adults making a documentary of an alleged haunted house. They perform a ritual to summon the dead for the purposes of getting documented proof of the afterlife. Like your typical demonic possession movie, things go wrong for this group pretty quickly. Where this movie separates itself from other films in its genre, is the investigation story arc.

This movie takes place after the young adult’s ritual goes tragically wrong. This movie is all about the police determining exactly what happened in the house. Unfortunately, that unique presence (and how well the filmmakers balanced the two storylines) is really all this movie has going for it. It’s characters are severely underdeveloped, detective Lewis jumps to conclusions to get the plot moving, and flashback storyline was severely generic. It is boringly generic movie, with somewhat of a unique twist but that is not enough to save the movie from its problems.


Tucker & Dale vs. Evil
Train to Busan
The Conjuring
Velvet Buzzsaw
Bird Box
In the Tall Grass
The Ritual
The Babysitter
Gerald's Game
Little Evil
14 Cameras
Hold the Dark
The Perfection
Would You Rather
The Eyes of My Mother
Green Room
Meet the Blacks
The Bar
Death Note
Yoga Hosers
The Invitation
13 Cameras
The Open House
I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, reelrundown.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)