Movie Review: "Viral"

Updated on September 26, 2019
Movie Beasts profile image

There are many movies that are worth seeing, but there are a lot of stinkers as well. My goal here is to weed out the good from the bad.


Theatrical Release: 7/29/2016
Theatrical Release: 7/29/2016 | Source


Emma (Sofia Black-D'Elia) is a decent girl at her school. She does her homework, and has an innocent crush on a boy at her school. There is another girl, Stacy (Analeigh Tipton), who is a rebel. She smokes at school, is very openly affectionate with her boyfriend and takes advantage of any opportunity in which she can mess with Emma. Oh, and the two girls are sisters. As if that was not bad enough, their dad is a teacher at their school and does not hesitate at an opportunity to embarrass Emma in his class.

When a girl at their school gets sick, from a parasitic virus, the town begins to go into panic, school is dismissed, and a curfew is put in place. When Emma, and Stacy's father goes to the airport to pick up their mother, the outbreak begins to reach uncontainable heights and the town is put under quarantine by the United States military. With their parents gone, the two girls are told to stay in the house to wait this thing out. Stacy has other plans, that certainly do not include staying couped up in the house with her sister, and so the madness begins.

Official Trailer

The Pros & Cons

The Pros
The Cons
Sisters (+4pts)
Generic Characters (-4pts)
The Infected (+8pts)
Bad Decisions (-6pts)
Intensity (+5pts)
Slows Down (-4pts)
All movies start with an average score of 75pts, points are then awarded for each Pro and taken away for each Con. Each Pro or Con is designated points ranging from 0-10 allowing me to convey to you how significant these Pros or Cons are.

Pro: Sisters (+4pts)

I really enjoyed the dynamic between the two sisters in this film. Emma (Sofia Black-D'Elia) and Stacy (Analeigh Tipton) both go to the same high-school. While Emma is well behaved and spends her nights studying, Stacy is a bit of a rebel who spends her nights partying or hanging out with her boyfriend. The two could not be more different, and they resent each other for it. As the outbreak unfolds, the two sisters must endure the tragedy together. Despite their differences, the two are siblings so they obviously care about each other deep down.

While there have been so many apocalypse or infection films, this one focuses on the relationship between two sisters and how far they are willing to go in order to save each other. I liked both characters, I liked their chemistry together, and I liked how their relationship developed over the course of this film.

My only complaint is that I wish the film did not have a love interest for both characters, because we have seen struggling romances during outbreak movies before. For Stacy's character, having a boyfriend seemed necessary. For Emma's character, it felt like a forced and unnecessary character. I wish we could have gotten more time with these sisters so that their relationship could be better developed on screen.


Con: Slows Down (-5pts)

This movie does not waste too much time getting started. We basically find out that Emma and Stacy are sisters, Emma has a crush on a guy, Stacy is very rebellious with another guy, and their dad is a teacher at their high school. The film does not spend too much time on all of this (maybe about twenty minutes or so). Before long, a girl at the school gets sick, coughs blood on another student, and so begins the outbreak in this small town.

Like I said, the film does not waste too much time getting started. After the initial incident at the school, the outbreak escalates and things start to get crazy, but then the movie takes a turn and slows way down. The movie quickly turns into Stacy, Emma, and Emma's crush, all hiding out in their (Emma and Stacy's) house. The next thirty minutes (or so) are spent watching the three characters trying to wait out the apocalypse. I (for the most part) enjoyed the pacing of this film and I enjoyed the relationship between the two sisters, but I thought this part of the story felt unnecessarily slow.


Pro: The Infected (+8pts)

Why are zombies not very scary? Because they are usually very slow. Luckily, the creatures in this film are not zombies. They are not dead. Instead, they are controlled by the parasite that has infected them. The infected are very fast, very strong, and cannot see. Instead, the infected operate entirely on their senses of sound and touch. If they cannot hear anything, parasitic tentacles start coming out of the hosts' mouth and ears in an attempt to hear more clearly.

These things are gross, violent, and extremely dangerous. It really felt like one could not outrun or out power one of these things which is something that zombie films are missing. My only issue with the infected was that they rarely do more than spit blood on people. Sure, they felt threatening during the movie, but I feel like the threat would have been more impactful if we had seen what these creatures were capable of.


Con: Bad Decisions (-6pts)

This is one issue that too many horror films suffer from. Yet again, we have a horror film in which the plot relies heavily on the main characters making poor decisions. Someone you know has just been infected? Sure, sleep next to them, on a bed, in an enclosed space. There is an infected creature on the other side of your front door? Sure, walk closer to the door and look through the peep hole so you can be sure it is still there (which it definitely is). Your wife is stranded at the airport because of a parasitic outbreak in your town? Sure, leave your two teenage girls home alone and in that same town. These are just a few examples of the bad decisions that drive the plot of this film. The biggest problem with them is that the film could have written these moments out very easily. Instead, the filmmakers chose stupid characters over a well written script.


Pro: Intensity (+5pts)

I will be honest that there are not too many "scares" in this film. Sure, it is a horror movie, so there are a couple scenes that try to get jump scares out of the viewer, but that does not happen too often in the movie. However, there were a few scenes that really play into the intensity. Like I mentioned before, the infected were fast and powerful, but they could not see. This made a few scenes very intense, because the infected would be standing there, and moving very slowly while trying to hear its victim.

As a viewer, you are watching this creature moving slowly while the characters do their best to stay silent. These scenes can be very intense because the characters (and the viewers) are fully aware that, at the slightest sound from the potential victim, the infected could start charging and try to kill them. This makes for some very intense scenes.


Con: Generic Characters (-4pts)

One of this film's biggest flaws is how generic a lot of the characters were. The neighbor is the "boy next door", his step-dad is the "abusive parent", the girls father is "the nice but embarrassing father", Stacy's boyfriend (Machine Gun Kelly) is "the rebellious and cheating boyfriend", etc. You have seen most of these characters before, in other films, and you have seen how these characters interact with each other. This is a decent movie but it's characters are mostly generic.

Grading Scale


Grade: C+ (75pts)

For the most part, this was a pretty average horror movie. It had some cool monsters, with its infected, and it had interesting main characters. Sure, most of the characters in the film were generic, including the sisters, but watching the sisters interacting with each other during the outbreak was entertaining (enough) to watch. The infected's characteristics provided for some real intense moments, but (for the most part) the horror was not focused on too heavily. This film was about the sisters.

The film also falls into the trap of pushing it's plot along by having the characters make bad decisions. I do not know why so many horror films do this, but there are terrible decisions made, left and right, throughout this movie. It would be nice to have at least one smart character in a horror film. Imagine that, have horrific things happen, even though a character makes all the right decisions. I feel like that would be more scary to a lot of audiences. No one relates with an idiot.

Overall, this was not a bad movie. It has it's problems but they are the same problems that so many horror movies fall into. The infected were intense, and the two main characters were entertaining to watch (when together). I do not think this film will blow anyone's mind, but it is not a bad movie to watch if you are looking for (at least an average) horror movie.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • Coffeequeeen profile image

      Louise Powles 

      2 years ago from Norfolk, England

      Yes, with Halloween around the corner, I shall also be watching my fair share of scary movies! I enjoyed reading your article. This one sounds interesting.

    • NessMovieReviews profile image

      Mother of Movies and Series Reviews 

      2 years ago from Moreton Bay, Queensland

      I love the way you've set this article up. As a horror fan, I look forward to your 30 days of it. I didn't mind this film but I agree with your allocated points due to the justification. Thumbs up.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)