Movie Review: “Us”

Updated on April 10, 2019
Movie Beasts profile image

There are many movies that are worth seeing, but there are a lot of stinkers as well. My goal here is to weed out the good from the bad.

Us

Theatrical Release: 3/22/2019
Theatrical Release: 3/22/2019 | Source

Synopsis

Adelaide (Lupita Nyong’o) has not quite gotten over a trauma from her childhood. As a child, she found herself stuck inside a carnival’s hall of mirrors. The power was out, and no one else was around, or so she thought. Faced with many reflections of herself, there was one reflection that did not respond to her movement. She soon realized she was not looking at a reflection, but was looking at a copy of herself. The copy was wearing almost identical clothes, and was extremely terrifying. Adelaide got out of the hall of mirrors as quickly as she could, but it was an experience that will haunt her for the rest of her life.

In present day, Adelaide and her family are going on a summer vacation near the very same beach where Adelaide found herself stuck in the hall of mirrors all of those years ago. After her son has a strange experience with a man outside the hall of mirrors, she tells her husband, Gabe (Winston Duke), about the trauma she experienced as a child. Adelaide thinks that her doppelgänger is coming after her, although Gabe is not convinced that what Adelaide saw was real. However, that night, four shadowy figures appear at the end of the driveway of the vacation home. The figures form a family that looks a lot like theirs and, after creepily standing there for awhile, the shadow family make their move. Before long, Adelaide’s family comes face to face with the mysterious family who looks exactly like them. It is unclear what this family of copies wants, but they clearly want to do Adelaide and her family harm.

Official Trailer

The Pros & Cons

The Pros
The Cons
Lupita Nyong’o (+10pts)
The Beginning (-2pts)
The Doppelgängers & The Plot (+10pts)
The “Tethered” (-4pts)
Winston Duke & The Kids (+6pts)
The End (-4pts)
All movies start with an average score of 75pts, points are then added or subtracted based on each Pro and Con. Each Pro or Con is designated points, ranging from 0-10, to convey how significant these Pros or Cons are.
Source

Pro: Lupita Nyong’o (+10pts)

You will see this from most reviews of this movie (or any movie starring Lupita Nyong‘o), but Lupita Nyong’o did an absolutely incredible job with this movie. Every main cast member has to play two very different characters and, while the entire cast did a good job with this, Lupita Nyong’o shines above the rest. She made it easy to get invested in the main character and her story, while making the audience captivated with the story’s antagonist. Adelaide is a loving mother, and a loving wife, but she is still haunted by what she saw when she was a child. Lupita Nyong’o was riveting to watch as she brought Adelaide’s complexity to the screen, but her performance was made even more riveting by her portrayal of Red.

Red is Adelaide’s doppelgänger and was incredibly captivating to watch. From the creepy facial expressions, to the creepier posture, and the even creepier voice, Red was the kind of horror villain that fascinated the audience. To make things even better, despite how creepy Red was, it was obvious that there was more to this character, which I was intrigued to eventually see uncovered, and Lupito Nyong’o deserves most of the credit for adding that extra layer of interest. The two characters are very different from one another, and Lupita Nyong’o made them both equally compelling. Adelaide had a lot going on in her head, and Red was the enigma that kept fans glued to their seats. It was truly an incredible performance from the talented actress.

Source

Con: The Beginning (-2pts)

I liked the movie a lot, but it had a weird start. There were about four intro scenes. Any one or two of these would have been fine, but all of them together made the beginning of the movie feel choppy and slow. There was an intro scene explaining what happened to Adelaide as a child (which could have been handled through flashbacks), there was an intro scene showing someone watching ads on an old television, there was an opening credits intro, and there was an intro scene for Adelaide and her family in present day. Again, one or two of these would have been fine, but all of them together (especially with the long opening credits) made for a pretty slow start to the movie. Fortunately, the movie picked up quickly after these scenes were done.

Source

Pro: The Doppelgängers & The Plot (+10pts)

We live in a time where making a horror movie usually means making a generic demonic possession (usually of a child) story. There are plenty of exceptions to this, but most of the exceptions still end up feeling poorly written or filled with lazy scares. The filmmakers set this movie apart from all of that. There are plot issues, sure (I will get into those later), but the movie had a strong premise that was executed in a really entertaining way.

The idea of a family of evil doppelgängers was as interesting as it was different. What are the doppelgängers and what do they want? These are the questions that will get the audience invested in the story. Once invested, the unique premise will have audiences wondering how the story will end, how (or if) the main characters will survive, and what will their lives be like if they do survive. It was an interesting premise that provided a unique, compelling, entertaining, and unpredictable story. It was also full of interesting metaphors if you are looking for them, but none of those metaphors will beat you over the head or distract you from the movie in any way (in other words, they do not feel forced). Again, there were some plot issues, but they were minor issues, relative to how fun and unique this movie was.

Source

Con: The “Tethered” (-4pts)

There are a bunch of areas throughout this story where the filmmakers completely abandoned logic. One example is how the filmmakers used the connection between each character and their doppelgängers. Throughout the movie, the doppelgängers were referred to as “the tethered”. The reason for this name was that each character had a connection with their counterpart. Unfortunately, I thought the filmmakers did a poor job of explaining this connection.

The actions that one character did, directly influenced their counterpart (like a mirror). However, this only applied when it was convenient for the filmmakers. They seemed to use this connection whenever it conveniently benefited the story and seemed to abandon the connection whenever it was convenient for there to be no connection between the characters. It just felt like the filmmakers did not think the concept through and, instead, forced the audience to rely heavily on the suspension of disbelief. There were more examples where the filmmakers abandoned logic, but this was the only area that I felt I could properly explain without spoiling the movie. All of the areas were examples of lazy filmmaking, but I fortunately liked the movie enough to get past these issues (to an extent).

Source

Pro: Winston Duke & The Kids (+6pts)

While Lupita Nyong’o was the obvious standout of this movie, the rest of the main cast did a great job with their respective roles as well. Winston Duke played the father (and his tethered), Shahadi Wright Joseph played the daughter (and her tethered), and Evan Alex played the son (and his tethered). Each of these actors played two very different primary characters in this movie, and each did a great job at this. Obviously, some of these characters were more important than others, but there was not a weak link in this main cast. Their strong performances were crucial in making the audience care about this family, while also maintaining the audience’s interest in the tethered.

Source

Con: The End (-4pts)

What can I say about this without spoiling anything? The movie ends in a way that I enjoyed, on the surface. However, once I started thinking about it, there was a lot that happened earlier in the movie that did not support this ending. There were some things that supported this ending, but there were just as many things that did not support it. In other words, the ending made a lot of character’s previous actions make little sense. I would be interested to watch this movie again to see what my knowledge of the ending does to my perception of these actions. Maybe a repeat viewing will change my mind on the matter but, after reflecting back on some decisions and comments from some characters earlier in the movie, I felt like this particular ending was a little unjustified.

Grading Scale

Grade
Category
Points
A+
Amazing
95-100
A-
Great
90-94
B+
Good
85-89
B-
Decent
80-84
C+
Average
75-79
C-
Watchable
70-74
D+
Bad
65-69
D-
Terrible
60-64
F
Garbage
45-59
Source

Grade: A- (91pts)

I liked Get Out and, although I had a few issues with it, I was still really excited to see Jordan Peele’s second movie. I liked Us even more than I liked Get Out, but I had a few issues with this movie as well. The main issue with the movie was that some of the concepts and ideas were not thought all the way through. The idea of the “tethered” was a good one, on paper, but the connection between characters seemed to be utilized or abandoned whenever it was convenient for the filmmakers. I had my issues with the ending as well, with respect to it not feeling entirely justified, but I do not want to get too much more into that to avoid spoilers. While I thought the plot definitely had some issues, Jordan Peele's story was still one that I found compelling.

The movie had a unique idea so was naturally unpredictable, but it was also interesting on the surface and was packed with interesting metaphors (if you are someone who likes to look for those). The main cast also did a fantastic job of each playing two very different characters, but Lupita Nyong'o was the obvious star of this movie. She is a very talented performer and absolutely crushed the roles of both Adelaide and Red. Adelaide was relatable, but had a mysterious and traumatic past. Meanwhile Red was creepy and unstable in the absolute most entertaining way. The movie had an interesting story, but Lupita Nyong'o made Us very captivating. This is the kind of movie that will stick with me and will have me talking about for a while. Get Out was solid, and I liked Us even more, so I am definitely excited for whatever Jordan Peele has in store for us next.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, reelrundown.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://reelrundown.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)