Movie Review: “Jumanji: The Next Level”

Updated on May 31, 2020
Movie Beasts profile image

There are many movies that are worth seeing, but there are a lot of stinkers as well. My goal here is to weed out the good from the bad.

Jumanji: The Next Level

Theatrical Release: 12/13/2019
Theatrical Release: 12/13/2019 | Source

Synopsis

Although he and his friends barely made it out of Jumanji alive, Spencer (Alex Wolff) has struggled to move on. The game is cursed, and pulls people from the real-world inside the game. There are deadly challenges and threats around every corner, but the only way out is to finish the game. You have three lives, but if you lose all three, then you die for real. Although playing the game again is a huge risk, Spencer got to play as Dr. Bravestone (Dwayne Johnson) who is the type of person that Spencer wants to be in real life.

Dr. Bravestone is strong, he does not have asthma or allergies, he is brave, and he is a leader. Spencer wants to experience being Dr. Bravestone again, so he tries to fix the now broken game, and ends up getting sucked in once again. Knowing that Spencer is stuck in the game and that he cannot complete it by himself, his friends reluctantly enter the game to help him, but Spencer’s grandfather (Danny DeVito) and grandfather‘s friend (Danny Glover) get pulled in as well. Playing as Dr. Bravestone, Franklin Finbar (Kevin Hart), Ruby Roundhouse (Karen Gillan), and Professor Shelly Oberon (Jack Black), the group needs to find Spencer and complete the game. Unfortunately, they still each only have three lives, and are playing a harder level than their last time within the game.

Official Trailer

The Pros & Cons

The Pros
The Cons
The Impersonations (+6pts)
Spencer’s Plan (-2pts)
Milo & Eddie (+6pts)
Bethany (-2pts)
Jumanji (+8pts)
Lives & The Ending (-4pts)
All movies start with an average score of 75pts, points are then added or subtracted based on each Pro and Con. Each Pro or Con is designated points, ranging from 0-10, to convey how significant these Pros or Cons are.
Source

Pro: The Impersonations (+6pts)

This was obviously a sequel, so the filmmakers needed to do something to prevent this premise from feeling stale or too familiar. They did this through putting the characters in a new level of the game, which is fine, but the filmmakers had a much more effective idea for switching things up. They pulled in Spencer’s grandfather Eddie, played by Danny DeVito, and Eddie’s friend Milo, played by Danny Glover. Both actors have such unique voices and their inclusion meant that a good portion of the movie consisted of Dwayne Johnson doing an impression of Danny DeVito and Kevin Hart doing an impression of Danny Glover.

Both actors did an excellent job with their respective parts, and it made for a lot of really unique and entertaining scenes. I will get into what I liked about the two characters of Eddie and Milo later in this review, but the impressions alone were really entertaining. On top of that, there were character swaps in this movie and the impressions from Karen Gillan, Jack Black, and Awkwafina were pretty entertaining as well. However, the impressions from Kevin Hart and Dwayne Johnson provided the movie with a lot of entertaining and memorable moments, and the two actors deserve a lot of credit for pulling their parts off so effectively.

Source

Con: Spencer’s Plan (-2pts)

I get Spencer enjoying getting to play as Dr. Bravestone, but I do not buy that he would have been willing to risk his life by going back into Jumanji. However, for the sake of this section of the review, let us just assume that he would want to do that. I really do not understand what his plan was in entering the game by himself. He would have known that he could not have beaten the game by himself, and he would have had no reason to believe that his friends would show up. It also did not seem in character for him to want to stay in to Jumanji to live as Dr. Bravestone. It is a minor part of the movie, but is the action that kicks off all of the events of this story, and I think the filmmakers could have given Spencer's plan and motivations a bit more attention.

Source

Pro: Milo & Eddie (+6pts)

I liked these two characters for a few reasons. The first was that they made way for some entertaining impressions, but I have already gone into that at length. The second reason was that having two old characters meant that the younger characters would have to explain to them how video games work. If you have played video games and have tried to explain those video games to any old person, you will know that it can be a daunting task. Eddie and Milo are basically the worst versions of this, so there were a lot of entertaining scenes that consisted of the younger characters trying to explain video games to them, and trying to keep them from getting themselves or others killed.

Eddie and Milo's lack of video game knowledge made for some entertaining moments, and made for an interesting extra challenge for the younger characters to have to overcome. However, I also really enjoyed the character development that these two characters got. Eddie and Milo have known each other for almost all of their lives, and they have history. Eddie is still mad at Milo at the beginning of the story, and it is mostly a mystery as to why. Throughout the movie we then learn about these characters' history, and I liked the development that this relationship got. I felt that these two characters were once great friends, and I felt that one felt betrayed and hurt by the other's actions. I went into this movie expecting to like the impressions, but I did not expect to like the character development of these two characters as much as I did.

Source

Con: Bethany (-2pts)

The filmmakers could have handled this character better. They clearly wanted Eddie and Milo in the game, as a couple of the primary avatars (Dr. Bravestone, and Franklin Finbar). Spencer was already in the game and missing, but that left three of the main characters from the first movie (Bethany, Fridge, and Martha) and only two available avatars (Ruby Roundhouse, and Professor Shelly Oberon). The filmmakers' solution was to have Bethany simply not get sucked into the game, but this did not make any sense when considering where the characters were (and why Eddie and Milo both got sucked in when she did not). It is a minor issue, but one that easily could have been avoided by simply not having Bethany there when the other characters got pulled in, and instead could have just had her show up later.

Source

Pro: Jumanji (+8pts)

I do not want to give any settings away, but this movie went to a lot of new locations. The last movie was set almost exclusively in the jungle. This movie started in the jungle, but went to the desert, went to snowy mountains, required the protagonists to have to cross a dangerously worn and violent monkey infested bridge, and more. The filmmakers clearly wanted to take this movie up a notch from the last one, and I think they succeeded. We got to explore a lot more of Jumanji in this movie, and it ended in a way that left me very excited for another potential sequel, which could be a lot more in line with the original Jumanji movie.

Source

Con: Lives & The Ending (-4pts)

In the last movie, lives were used to make the adventure feel like a video game, while also giving the characters a sense of danger. In this movie, giving each character three lives felt like an inconvenience for the filmmakers. It felt like they wanted to get each character’s two extra lives out of the way. Rather than use the deaths to show the escalated danger throughout this level, therefore raising the stakes, the filmmakers made it so that the all characters were burning through their extra lives through silly mistakes. Then, by the film’s ending every character only had one life left, which just made the ending feel conveniently easy. In the last movie, the filmmakers creatively used the idea of extra lives. They had the opportunity to do it again in this movie, with having characters familiar with Jumanji, by using those extra lives to show how much more challenging this next level was. Instead, they used the lives for exclusively comedic purposes, which made the plot and the ending feel really convenient.

Grading Scale

Grade
Category
Points
A+
Amazing
95-100
A-
Great
90-94
B+
Good
85-89
B-
Decent
80-84
C+
Average
75-79
C-
Watchable
70-74
D+
Bad
65-69
D-
Terrible
60-64
F
Garbage
45-59
Source

Grade: B+ (87pts)

I liked Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle, so I was excited when I learned they were making a sequel. I was then more excited when I saw that Dwayne Johnson would be doing an impression of Danny DeVito, in addition to Kevin Hart doing an impression of Danny Glover. Sure, there was a possibility that the filmmakers would rely too heavily on this gimmick, but it was a funny enough concept and I liked the last movie, so I was more than willing to give this a shot. After having seen the movie, I can confidently say that the filmmakers did a really good job with this concept.

I had a few minor plot related issues, in relation to Spencer's plan, how the filmmakers used the multiple lives, and how convenient the ending was for the protagonists. That being said, I had a good time with this movie. The impressions were a blast, the relationship between Eddie and Milo was both entertaining and compelling, and this next level of Jumanji provided a lot more variety than the last movie which let the audience explore more of this world. It was a really fun adventure movie with plenty of comedy, strong and entertaining performances, and it left me excited for potential sequels.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • Movie Beasts profile imageAUTHOR

      Movie Beasts 

      6 months ago from MA

      Hey Liza,

      I would wait to rent it, unless you are absolutely dying to see it, and do not mind putting in the extra $$ to buy it. The second one was pretty good, and I would say it was comparable to the last movie (though not quite at the level of the original with Robin Williams).

      Based on how this movie ended, I think they will definitely make a third movie.

      Thanks for the comment!

    • lizmalay profile image

      Liza 

      6 months ago from USA

      I like the first one but, missed watching the second at the movie theater. I heard it wasn't good compared to the first one. So, I might be buying the digital soon so my family can watch it at home. Obviously, my favorite is the one with Robin Williams. Do you think they will make the third?

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, reelrundown.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)