Movie Review: “Bird Box”

Updated on January 8, 2019
Movie Beasts profile image

There are many movies that are worth seeing, but there are a lot of stinkers as well. My goal here is to weed out the good from the bad.

Bird Box

Netflix Release: 12/21/2018
Netflix Release: 12/21/2018 | Source

Synopsis

Malorie (Sandra Bullock) and her sister (Sarah Paulson) see the chaos on the news. People all over Russia are going crazy and killing themselves. No one knows what is causing it, but it is wreaking havoc on the Russian civilization. It is scary and no one knows the cause, but fortunately, it is currently isolated to Russia and has not reached North America. Malorie lives in California and is pregnant, so her sister takes her to the hospital for an ultrasound. It is a standard check-up, but everything changes when people start going crazy and killing themselves all over hospital and the city.

Whatever it is, it has now reached California. Malorie and her sister try their best to get somewhere safe, but the roads are far too chaotic to drive on safely. That is when they happen upon a house of fellow survivors. Malorie has reached safety, but is in the third trimester of her pregnancy. She must find a way to survive in this house of strangers, but more importantly, she must find a way to raise her child in this dangerous new world.

Official Trailer

The Pros & Cons

The Pros
The Cons
Sandra Bullock (+6pts)
Flash Forwards (-3pts)
John Malkovich (+3pts)
Bad Decisions (-3pts)
The Premise & Crazy People (+6pts)
MGK (-2pts)
All movies start with an average score of 75pts, points are then added or subtracted based on each Pro and Con. Each Pro or Con is designated points, ranging from 0-10, to convey how significant these Pros or Cons are.
Source

Pro: Sandra Bullock (+6pts)

There is no doubt about it, Sandra Bullock is a talented actress and she (unsurprisingly) did a great job in this movie. I truly believe that, had the filmmakers chosen another actress, this movie would have felt like little more than a straight-to-television movie. Granted, the movie did go straight to Netflix, but you know what I mean. With Sandra Bullock’s talent, this movie feels worthy of a theatrical release.

Sandra Bullock adds a lot of drama to this character. Malorie is a complex woman who ends up being a complex mother (you will know what I mean if you see the movie). The character has her issues, but she is not one to give up. Malorie is easy to root for, despite her flaws, and Sandra Bullock gave compelling layers to the character. She gave the character complexity that made the movie easy to get invested in.

Source

Con: Flash Forwards (-3pts)

I honestly do not understand what the point of these flash forwards were. At least, I am pretty sure they were flash forwards, but I guess it depends on what you consider the “current” timeline to be. The movie is constantly jumping back and forth between two different timelines. One timeline followed Malorie during the events that occurred when California was initially hit by whatever caused the craziness. The second timeline followed Malorie five years later, as she tried to get two children to another (safer) location.

When thinking about the story, there does not seem to be any good reason to tell the story in a non-chronological way. In other words, there is no need to jump back and forth between timelines. However, the story is fairly straight-forward and predictable. We have seen many apocalyptic storylines before, so my guess is that the filmmakers split the story into two different timelines in order to make the story seem more mysterious. Unfortunately, it was still a straight-forward and predictable story. The flash forwards only ended up disrupting the pacing of the story, and made the movie feel unnecessarily chopped up. To make things worse, the story was made more predictable by flashing forward, which (in a way) spoiled the outcomes of many characters.

Source

Pro: John Malkovich (+3pts)

He was not in the movie much, but John Malkovich made the movie much more entertaining when he was on screen. The guy has such a captivating on-screen presence, and he ends up being one of the more relatable characters (although I do not think the filmmakers intended him to be). His character is the one that does not want to help any survivors not already in the house. He is the character who is only looking out for himself. I believe he was intended to come across as the jerk of the story, but more often than not, he ended up being right and I ended up getting behind what he was saying.

There is no doubt about it, the guy is selfish. However, in order to survive an apocalypse, you sometimes have to be. Maybe it was due to the unique charisma of the actor in the role, but I definitely found myself liking this character even though I do not believe the filmmakers wanted that to be the case. He does not get a ton of screen time, but when this character is on screen, this movie gets a lot more interesting.

Source

Con: Bad Decisions (-3pts)

This is another one of those movies where the plot is pushed forward by having the characters make terrible decisions. There are a few points in the movie where the characters should pretty much have a handle on their situation. However, the plot needs to move forward, otherwise the movie would be pretty boring, so the writers have a character make a bad decision that puts everyone’s lives at risk. It is pretty lazy filmmaking, but happens all too often. The writers write themselves into a corner, then choose the laziest way possible to get themselves out of it. This move does not do this a lot, but it does it enough to make the issue worth mentioning.

Source

Pro: The Premise & Crazy People (+6pts)

I saw the trailer for this movie and thought it was going to be A Quiet Place meets The Mist. That is pretty much what it was, but I am glad I gave it a shot, because it was still entertaining. Much like A Quiet Place, the main character is pregnant, and much like A Quiet Place, the characters need to limit their lifestyle in order to survive. In A Quiet Place the characters cannot make noise. In this movie however, the antagonists take the form of the characters’ worst fear (like The Mist), so the characters must limit their sight in order to survive. The movie has its similarities to movies that came before it, but the movie is still pretty intense, and pretty entertaining.

The mentally insane play an important part of this story. When most characters open their eyes outside, they see their worst fears and end up killing themseves pretty quickly (usually in a horrific way). The mentally insane do not suffer the same fate, however. I do not want to explain this to avoid spoilers, but the mentally insane end up causing major problems for the rest of the characters. I liked this aspect of the story, as I found that it added an extra layer to the movie.

Source

Con: MGK (-2pts)

My issue with Machine Gun Kelly was not that he was bad in the movie. The issue I had was that his character (and one other character), was that it felt like he was randomly written out of the story. The character just kind of leaves without any warning, and without any payoff that could have come later. He did a fine job in the few scenes he was in, but the lack of screen time he got, made the casting felt cheap. It was like the filmmakers just wanted to say that Machine Gun Kelly was in their movie (or like Machine Gun Kelly just wanted to say he was in a movie).

Grading Scale

Grade
Category
Points
A+
Amazing
95-100
A-
Great
90-94
B+
Good
85-89
B-
Decent
80-84
C+
Average
75-79
C-
Watchable
70-74
D+
Bad
65-69
D-
Terrible
60-64
F
Garbage
45-59
Source

Grade: B- (82pts)

Bird Box was a decent movie. It was hard not to draw comparisons to movies like A Quiet Place and The Mist, but that did not take away from this movie. Bird Box follows a character who struggles to connect with other people, yet is forced into an apocalyptic scenario where she must connect with other people in order to survive. Malorie was a complex main character that Sandra Bullock played flawlessly. The movie has a premise that pulls viewers in, and has a lead actress that maintains that interest, but the movie was not without its problems. At the end of the day, this is an apocalypse story. We have seen stories like this before, and this movie follows the same beats that you would expect from a movie such as this.

In other words, Bird Box is predictable. To combat this, the filmmakers used two timelines (which the story jumps back and forth between) to try to add a level of mystery, but I thought it had the opposite effect. The movie was not any more unpredictable and, if anything, it was more predictable. We see that a lot of characters that are present in the earlier timeline, who are not present in the later timeline, so we can only assume the worst for them. On top of that, the movie is one that occasionally uses poor decision making by its characters as a plot device to keep the story moving. Again, the movie is not without its problems, but I think its pros end up outweighing its cons. It is far from an amazing movie, but it is definitely a decent one.

Movie Poll

In an apocalyptic scenario, which would be the hardest to survive without?

See results

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, reelrundown.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://reelrundown.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)