Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle Movie Review

Updated on December 25, 2017
Alec Zander profile image

Alec is a film critic with a true passion for the film industry & hopes his reviews and articles will help launch his career.

I originally was 100% against this film but then Dwayne Johnson came to the rescue and stated that this film will be a sequel to the original and will be respectful of it. So my hope was rekindled and the more ads I saw the more excited I got. I loved the cast and I let my expectations rise. But when I saw the film, my hope slowly began to fade and I was left feeling like I was lied to by someone I respected.

The film follows four kids who are all given detention for various reasons. The principal takes them to the school basement to do busy work. Oh, I should probably point out that they were unsupervised. Kinda like The Breakfast Club. What could 4 kids possibly do when unsupervised? Anyway, one of the kids finds an old game system from 1996 that was donated by the family of a kid who had disappeared 20 years earlier. The group hooks it up and decides to play it out of boredom. They are all sucked into the game and are forced to play through Jumanji in order to get back home.

Okay so, the story itself I don't have a problem with. I at first immediately compared the film's villain Van Pelt to the original. I was initially upset because the Van Pelt we all know and fear is an expert marksman with the best moustache in the jungle. This new Van Pelt was younger with black hair and a lot freakier. But I got to thinking that, in the original Jumanji, Alan was sucked into the game in 1969 and when he won time reset to the moment he was taken. So, with that in mind, it is very possible that the original Van Pelt had a son in that time. After all, there are characters that have always lived inside the game. We just didn't meet them last time. It would have been nice, however, to have at least had some sort of dialogue that would confirm that but unfortunately the film is extremely open and didn't really think through all the plot holes loyal fans of the original will undoubtedly find.

The biggest issue I had was the extreme tone change. The original was mostly dark and serious with some comedic moments. This one was practically all comedy with maybe one or two serious moments. I'm not against taking a more comedic approach but a lot of the jokes were extremely awkward and some were even unnecessary and did nothing for the film. The other issue was the change from board game to video game. I was wondering how exactly they would pull that off and I was honestly left underwhelmed. I realize the game is enchanted in a sense but can it really will itself to take other forms? Is it actually that strong of magic? This film just raised a ton of questions that will probably never be answered. The final issue was that when the game changed forms, it also changed its own mythos. It was no longer a world that reacted with the outside world. It was a world that was restricted to certain motions and certain dialogue just like a video game. It was way less daunting in video game form and nowhere near as frightening. It was almost basic in the sense that you could pretty well guess what was going to happen next and 99% of the time you'd be right. The animals changed too. Remember the mosquitoes in the first? The were monstrous and ripped the top off a car. In this they were microscopic and unseen. Huh? Change back into a board game. You were more fun that way.

There were positive elements though that puts me on the fence about the film. For one, the cast was spectacular. Jack Black was the standout performer and had me cracking up throughout the whole film. Karen Gillan was the next best, showing that she has some good acting range. While she was still the kickass female lead, she was also insecure and gave us a more relatable character. Dwayne Johnson comes in third as the sometimes funny and sometimes annoying lead man. Kevin Hart comes in last as he generally played the character he always plays: whiny and loud.

The second positive was that we actually got to see the hut that Alan Parrish built all those years ago when he had been sucked into the game. It was a nice reference to the original but far from a tribute to Robin. It was more like they just threw it in there because so many people were upset about this originally being a remake. The continuity was laughable at best.

In conclusion, I had some fun in the theater but I was more disappointed than happy with the film. The cast's acting was a huge plus but the continuity issues was a huge negative. So, I give the film a 2 out of 4.

Questions & Answers

    © 2017 Alec Zander

    Comments

      0 of 8192 characters used
      Post Comment

      • thedevilinme profile image

        Phillip 6 months ago from Northampton, United Kingdom

        First film was good fun but too old for this now

      • Ian Rideout profile image

        Ian Rideout 6 months ago from Alberta, Canada

        Good review. I remember seeing the original Jumanji years ago and quite enjoying it. I didn't even know they were making a sequel until I saw a trailer for it a few weeks ago. I wouldn't mind checking it out sometime, although even I was confused as to why it was suddenly a video game instead of a board game.

      working

      This website uses cookies

      As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, reelrundown.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

      For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: "https://reelrundown.com/privacy-policy#gdpr"

      Show Details
      Necessary
      HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
      LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
      Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
      AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
      Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
      CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
      Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
      Features
      Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
      Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
      Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
      Marketing
      Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
      Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
      Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
      Statistics
      Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
      ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)