Skip to main content

Catching Up: "10 Cloverfield Lane" (2016)

  • Author:
  • Updated date:

priley84 loves movies and loves writing about them. He has written film reviews for his school paper and blogs.

"10 Cloverfield Lane" movie poster

"10 Cloverfield Lane" movie poster

Director: Dan Trachtenberg
Cast: Mary Elizabeth Winstead, John Goodman, John Gallagher, Jr., Bradley Cooper’s voice

Note: I've been such a slacker this year. I wrote this review after seeing it in theaters in March. Why I've waited till now to publish, I do not know. Anyway, I hope you enjoy!

The trailers for 10 Cloverfield Lane revealed nothing about the movie except that it has a good cast, it takes place mostly inside a doomsday bunker, and there's something bad happening outside. Apart from that, there was really nothing to go on. What was the story? What did Winstead see when she looked outside at the end of the trailer? More to the point, why did the usually genial John Goodman look so friggin’ mean?

Only those who have seen the movie know the truth now, and that is how it should be. Assuming you haven’t already seen this movie, I will refrain from giving an in-depth plot synopsis with this review. The less you know about this relentlessly intense jewel of a thriller going in, the better.

It begins with a young woman named Michelle (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) packing up her things and leaving her apartment while her abusive husband is away at work. Right from the beginning, the movie has us under its spell. There's little to no dialogue here, but debut filmmaker Dan Trachtenberg is able to set up the leading lady’s story by relying on Winstead’s stellar performance and knowing exactly where to place the camera and when to move it. It's brilliant filmmaking.

After a quick stop at a gas station one night, Michelle is rammed off the road by a mysterious driver. When she wakes up, she finds her leg chained to a stone wall and an IV in her arm. Her “rescuer” Howard (John Goodman) comes in with a tray of food and tells her that he saved her life. It's dangerous outside, he says, and the only way for her to survive is to stay in the bunker he helped make and live by his rules.

It's all fun and games until Roseanne's husband shows up!

It's all fun and games until Roseanne's husband shows up!

Is he telling her the truth? Has something happened outside, or is he just a psychopath who kidnapped her and is holding her against her will? The movie has us asking these questions for the majority of the film, and it is in those moments that the movie is at its best. There are hints that something is indeed happening on the outside world, but Howard is such a volatile and unpredictably violent character that it seems very likely that it might be more dangerous staying inside the bunker than going out.

The performances add considerably to the tension. John Goodman is absolutely riveting as Howard, a man who at times comes across as likable and endearing, but can snap into a frighteningly violent episode in the blink of an eye (there's a dinner scene early on that's almost painful in its intensity). Sometimes we’ll see the anger rising, such as when he’ll start clenching his fists repeatedly, whereas other times we’re not sure what he's thinking and what his intentions are (just look at the scary game of charades that's played later on).

According to IMDB, Winstead was the first and only choice to play Michelle, and it isn’t hard to see why. Simply put, she’s excellent, although you’d expect nothing less from her. Her Michelle is not a damsel in distress, but rather an extremely smart and resourceful young woman who can take care of herself. When she first wakes up in the bunker, she doesn’t just sit there whimpering. She makes a number of efforts to escape her situation, going so far as to create a weapon out of a crutch Howard gave her to use. She’s also not a one-note badass, either. She brings much vulnerability and humanity to her role, especially during the scene where she reveals her main regret to the third character in the bunker, a young man named Emmett.

Which brings us to John Gallagher, Jr. An immensely charming actor who won me over in 2013’s superb Short Term 12, he imbues his character with an innate likability, but there came a point where I started to question his character’s motives. Just hear me out. He tells Michelle that he helped Howard build the bunker, yes? If Howard is indeed crazy, is he an accomplice in some way? If so, can he really be trusted? Did he play some part in…

Oh, sweet Moses! What's in the barrel?!?! D8

Oh, sweet Moses! What's in the barrel?!?! D8

See, now I’ve said too much. To reveal any more about the plot would be downright criminal on my part. I can say that the final fifteen minutes take place outside the bunker (some of the TV spots reveal that much), and we finally learn the truth about what's really going on outside. Given how terrific many of the scenes inside the bunker are, the climactic moments can’t help but feel a little bit like a letdown. Some of it is admittedly entertaining (Winstead’s reaction to a particular moment is priceless), while some of it is just downright goofy (such as when a Molotov cocktail comes into play).

That said, 10 Cloverfield Lane is a riveting and entertaining thriller. It's suspenseful as heck, and even though the ending is the weakest part of the movie, the visuals are consistently engrossing from start to finish. Special mention must be made of the eerie music by Bear McCreary, whose violin piece during the Paramount Pictures logo at the beginning was so hypnotic that it immediately hooked me. You know you’re watching a good movie when you find yourself hooked before the first fade in.

Rated PG-13 for violent and disturbing images, some strong language.

Final Grade: *** ½ (out of ****)

What did you think of this movie? :D


priley84 (author) from Warner Robins, Ga on September 13, 2016:

You should! It's really very good! :D

Larry Rankin from Oklahoma on September 12, 2016:

I've really been wanting to see this one.

priley84 (author) from Warner Robins, Ga on August 30, 2016:


My distrust for Emmett didn't last very long (there came a point long before his unfortunate demise where it was very clear he wasn't a bad guy), but it was there for a time.

And I guess I just assumed she came from an abusive marriage because the tone during the scene where she was leaving was so ominous. I felt to me like she wasn't leaving a guy she fell out of love with, but rather she was leaving something that was potentially dangerous.

And as for the surprise about what was outside, even the title didn't clue me in on it, because I had read in other places that this movie had nothing to do with the 2008 movie Cloverfield. When I first saw the trailer, it was my initial thought, but reading the reviews of those who had seen managed to keep me in the dark (although you knew something was going on, given the particular moment when Michelle spots a dying woman outside).

Danielle on August 28, 2016:

*Major SPOILERS follow*

I can sorta see people's initial distrust of Emmett what with Howard being so off himself, however, on further inspection my thoughts are this: Why would Howard have such an issue with Emmett being there with them if Emmett was his accomplice? And wouldn't Emmett play by the rules more if he was an accomplice? And any guy who dies trying to protect you, is not in my opinion an accomplice...

I really loved Emmett! He was the one character I truly wanted to of course, he has to die. :(

Also, some that have watched the movie said they thought Emmett was the real threat and Howard just misunderstood...did those people see the same movie? (I looked up people's thoughts after watching it because the movie really does spark debate.) And to those people who think this I just say---did you see when she is trying to escape after the fire and he is trying to stab her through the vent...? How is that him just being misunderstood?

Ok, rant over, lol.

And on to the surprise on what is outside...totally saw that coming based on the title. Cloverfield reference clued me in it would be alien based. So, no shocker for me...but I did like how they had her not going and running to safety at the end but instead going to help people. So she has a turn around from the beginning. She has been majorly changed from her experience.

Oh, and speaking of the beginning, I only thought she was leaving her fiancé not her husband. And I never got that he was abusive from the opening...or from when she spoke to him on the phone in the car (before the accident). I only thought the she was skulking off because she realized that he wasn't what she wanted any more and she didn't want to have to face him. Which is why the ending in that respect was so good. She is willing to face her problems head on now.

Ok, I think that is all I have to add, lol. But this movie really does make you wonder and think (both while watching and after) despite it being a scary movie (which I only went to see because I found the trailer so effective)...I actually liked it to some degree.