'Bird Box' (2018) Movie Review

Updated on January 3, 2019
John Plocar profile image

I've seen A Quiet Place, Night of the Living Dead, and The Happening. I know exactly how to talk about this movie.

A Quiet Bird Box… I Mean… Night of the Living Bird Box… I Mean… Bird Box. Just Bird Box.

I understand that Bird Box is based on a book of the same name. Regardless of that, the final product of the film feels heavily influenced by this year’s A Quiet Place as well as George A. Romero’s Night of the Living Dead. Also sprinkle in a little bit of M. Night Shyamalan’s The Happening in there for good measure. Whether or not this is a faithful adaptation of the novel or not, I honestly couldn’t tell you because I haven’t read it, I can only speak for what I’ve seen in this movie. Inside this movie we have about half taking place in an abandoned home filled with a small group of people that are taking refuge from a dangerous and seemingly supernatural force outside trying to kill them. The other half is inter-spliced in with the rest is a post-apocalyptic future years after the initial chaos revolving around a small family that managed to stay alive and must remain without certain senses in order to survive the creatures that are constantly waiting to strike. The way that this entity kills its prey is by creating some sort of hypnotism on anyone who sees it and makes them so insane that they more often than not tend to kill themselves, except for the select few people that for some reason are entranced by the beings and they try to force everyone they can into also seeing the monsters so they may “know the truth.” Sounds like we have a few movies inside of one, don’t we? I’m sure that the book wasn’t written to be a rip-off of anything and it probably is completely original in its own right, but the 2018 movie comes across as Netflix’s cash-in on mainly A Quiet Place with the sensory deprivation aspect of its story, only with a slightly different spin. Instead of it being based on sound, it is actually more visual.

Sandra Bullock can't see at the moment.
Sandra Bullock can't see at the moment.

Even though the plot and several other aspects are tremendously familiar from other examples, there are some things that work about it. The acting all around is solid, especially from Sandra Bullock as Malorie, who is giving this performance 100% of her efforts. There are some suspenseful sequences scattered here and there that were cool to watch. The effects and cinematography are very well done for the most part, this was a good looking movie. Aside from its familiarity, my biggest problems reside in the editing and the writing.

Let’s Start with the Editing, Shall We?

Bird Box’s structure is probably one of the more frustrating things about it because it is constantly making sure that I don’t give a single solitary crap about anything happening with most of the characters since it spoils practically everyone’s fate within the first few minutes of the movie. It’s one of those movies that breaks the story up between two separate story lines. Both revolving around Sandra Bullock’s character, but one is centered on the initial first days of the epidemic and the second is years later when Bullock with her two children are traveling by river to find a new place for safety. It would be fine if the story was set in a linear fashion, but it’s not. We open with one of my most hated clichés, a suspense driven opening scene only to cut to a black screen with the title card saying, “Five Years Earlier”. I hate that. Then it cuts back to just before the fatal event that leads to Bullock finally taking refuge in a house full of strangers that she doesn’t know, and every time the movie feels the need for an ‘action beat’ we cut back to five years later on Bullock and the kids fending off against psychos or trying to fight the water current to avoid drowning. Then cut back to five years earlier. Five years later. Five years earlier. Five years later. Five years ear- later. Earlier. Later. Back and forth and I don’t care about anything going on in the past since I know that everyone except Sandra Bullock is going to die while I can’t get into the suspense of anything going on with her character presently since it feels like shallow excuses to slip in tension briefly. The movie feels like the filmmakers have no faith in anyone’s attention span so instead of letting a story simply play out and let the tension build within the natural narrative, they have to interject the suspenseful scenes into the slower segments and it is aggravating.

Five Years Eariler... I hate it.
Five Years Eariler... I hate it.
Five Years Later... I still hate it.
Five Years Later... I still hate it.

I wanted to like these characters, I wanted to be left wondering who might make it out alive and who might not, I wanted to be riveted by the ‘scarier’ moments, but this movie always seemed to be determined to sabotage itself instead of letting me have an enjoyable sit. This movie might as well have had the words ‘Spoiler Alert’ printed across the screen in the opening shot since from there we know that when it cuts backwards, nothing matters anymore when we already saw exactly where it all is going to lead anyway.

Opening scene shows Bullock speaking with two children, cut back to five years prior with Bullock being pregnant and another woman in the midst of strangers residing inside the house who is also pregnant; I wonder what this means. There seems to be a romance between Bullock and Trevante Rhodes’ character in the past segments, yet he is not present within the future portions; gee, I haven’t a clue what could have happened to him. It’s annoying because this movie, if edited correctly, could have been fine but unfortunately they had to meddle. God forbid the audience actually wait for things to become scary or suspenseful, let’s just take all the action beats from the second half of the story and toss them in throughout the first half. Perfect!

I'm totally going to make it to the end of the movie, no doubt about it...
I'm totally going to make it to the end of the movie, no doubt about it...
What?! You're pregnant too and having your baby at the EXACT same time as when I'm having mine??!! What a coincidence...
What?! You're pregnant too and having your baby at the EXACT same time as when I'm having mine??!! What a coincidence...

It’s just disappointing because they used this technique in order to thrill the viewer, but what really wound up happening was it took me completely out of the moment every time they cut back and forth. If someone were to do some sort of ‘fan-edit’ to make this in chronological order it would probably be all the better for it. I wouldn’t say that it would be perfect by any means, but it would at least be better.

The Writing Could Be Better

The writing isn’t necessarily bad, and if the narrative structure were fixed then this stuff probably wouldn’t have bothered me as much. Yet here we are. The characters end up doing some real stupid things for no reason other than they need to die or cause others to die. Whether they needlessly sacrifice themselves when the issue could have been easily resolved another way, or they make a decision that is obviously dumb and do it anyways.

Seeing these creatures is what causes people to kill themselves here, every character knows this for a fact fairly early on, yet when a certain person opens a window to the outside, there is someone is so drawn to the light from the window that I’m fairly certain they’re father was a moth. Stupid.

Derp.
Derp.

A crazy person is forcing themselves inside and there are three people barely keeping the door shut, a fourth man witnessing all of this could have run and shoved the intruder back out or helped slam the door closed, but instead rushes towards the crazed man and pushed them both outside. Another one bites the dust.

Step 1: Dude tries to break in.
Step 1: Dude tries to break in.
Step 2: Sacrifice yourself.
Step 2: Sacrifice yourself.

A man is outside in the middle of gunfire with the creature worshipping maniacs, instead of not looking towards exactly where he knows one of those things are, he looks right at it. And boom goes the dynamite.

But... I was supposed to make it.....
But... I was supposed to make it.....

There’s a lot of idiotic moments that also pull me out of caring about anyone here, most of everyone’s fate is their own fault. Also the fact that there’s this relatively forced character arc for Sandra Bullock where she emotionally distances herself so much from her children that she named them ‘Boy’ and ‘Girl’ as though she is refusing to give them a true name… I’m sorry but at that point, lady, you have technically named them. Just because you call them Boy and Girl doesn’t mean they don’t have names, that is their names after you’ve designated those titles upon them for five whole years. Get over your B.S. ma’am. I’m sorry, it was a lame arc that amounted to exactly where one could easily guess how it would go.

Girl. Boy. I shall never love you. But after my character arc is finished I shall then decide to love you.
Girl. Boy. I shall never love you. But after my character arc is finished I shall then decide to love you.

Yeah It’s On Netflix, But Why Bother?

I can’t come up with much reason as to why anyone would really have any need to see Bird Box. It’s not the worst thing that I’ve seen this year or even on Netflix, but it has too many elements in it that can be seen executed in far superior ways. Such as the examples I referenced earlier with A Quiet Place or Night of the Living Dead. Even in terms of bad movies with similar features about an invisible force causing people to commit suicide, The Happening was more entertaining than this. Technically a much worse movie, but still has more of an entertainment value than Bird Box. Sandra Bullock performs at her best, John Malkovich is always amusing, and Trevante Rhodes was fairly charismatic. There are a couple of times where the movie can be somewhat suspenseful. But it wasn’t enough to carry the film with the amount of problems it has structurally. I personally say to skip this and continue your search for something else from the wide array available on Netflix.

Well... We tried kid, but you weren't good enough.
Well... We tried kid, but you weren't good enough.

Questions & Answers

    © 2018 John Plocar

    Comments

      0 of 8192 characters used
      Post Comment
      • John Plocar profile imageAUTHOR

        John Plocar 

        10 months ago from Weatherford

        @Sarthak Awasthi

        Thank you! I'm glad that you enjoyed my review! =D

      • SKAIisTheCritic profile image

        Sarthak Awasthi 

        10 months ago

        Great job John. For me it's your best so far. Love it.

      working

      This website uses cookies

      As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, reelrundown.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

      For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://reelrundown.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

      Show Details
      Necessary
      HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
      LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
      Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
      AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
      Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
      CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
      Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
      Features
      Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
      Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
      Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
      Marketing
      Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
      Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
      Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
      Statistics
      Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
      ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
      ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)