2019 Netflix Halloween Countdown: "Hush"

Updated on October 31, 2019
Movie Beasts profile image

There are many movies that are worth seeing, but there are a lot of stinkers as well. My goal here is to weed out the good from the bad.

2019 Netflix Halloween Countdown

For my third annual Netflix Halloween Countdown, I will once again be watching and reviewing some of the spooky, scary, gory, chilling, and horror-themed movies on Netflix. With each review, I will be including an up-to-date table that ranks these movies from best to worst. If you are looking to get in the Halloween spirit, by watching some Halloween-style movies, then these articles are for you!


Home Video Release: 4/8/2016
Home Video Release: 4/8/2016 | Source


Maddie (Katie Siegel) is an up-and-coming young author. She has released one book which has achieved moderate success and she is about to start writing her next. Maddie lives in a relatively isolated house in the middle of the woods. She has one neighbor that she is pretty close with, but other than that, there is no one around. Oh, and more thing about Maddie, she is deaf.

One evening a psycho shows up in a mask and with a crossbow. He sees Maddie working through her window, and thus has found his next victim. He decides to surprise her by tapping on her glass window (hoping to scare her before killing her). The man quickly realizes that Maddie is deaf. He then decides to have some fun before killing her.

Official Trailer

The Pros & Cons

The Pros
The Cons
Sound (+6pts)
The Genre (-4pts)
Katie Siegel (+5pts)
Maddie (-4pts)
The Man (+5pts)
Dumb Decisions (-4pts)
All movies start with an average score of 75pts, points are then added or subtracted based on each Pro and Con. Each Pro or Con is designated points, ranging from 0-10, to convey how significant these Pros or Cons are.

Pro: Sound (+6pts)

The most appealing part of this movie was its premise. We have all seen home invasion movies before. Character is home alone, and intruder is trying to come in with bad intentions. This movie takes that very simple premise and flips it on its head by asking “what if the main character was deaf”?

How would said main character figure out that there is an intruder? How would they know that they are in danger? The antagonist can literally smash a window, or kick in a door, that is literally right behind Maddie and she would have no idea. This significantly decreases her chance of survival which makes this movie so compelling. It is easy to take sound and hearing for granted. This movie explores the concept that while hearing can be viewed as a non-essential luxury, it is one of our bodies’ most effective methods of informing us when we are in danger.


Con: The Genre (-4pts)

This movie had a fantastic premise. The deaf victim was a compelling concept to see explored, but at about the beginning of the second act, this movie goes in a different direction. At the beginning of the second act (still relatively early in the movie), we get a scene where the man is standing on the front steps showing Maddie that he is holding her phone. This scene is in the trailer, but I did not expect it to happen so early in the movie. From there, it turns into a mildly intense movie about defending one’s own house against someone who means them harm. This was mildly entertaining but the creepy, thrilling, suspenseful aspect of the movie was gone once Maddie knew what was going on, and once it was gone the movie ends up being very predictable.


Pro: Katie Siegel (+5pts)

For the most part, this movie was carried by the lead actress, Katie Siegel. Her performance will not stand out as an incredible dramatic performance, but she does a great job of making this relatively simple plot feel intense. She carries the tone of the movie, as she is mostly acting by herself through the majority of it (with her co-star being under a mask). Her performance will allow viewers to feel the panic and the weight of the situation that Maddie is in. Again, while you are watching the movie, Katie’s performance will not really stand out, but that is what I think makes it so great. She does not steal the show or overdo it, but will keep audiences engaged once the creepy tone of the story is gone. Katie is enough to hold audiences attention through the relatively simple and predictable story that this movie turns into.


Con: Maddie (-4pts)

While I thought Katie Siegel did a decent job in this role, the character of Maddie suffered from some lazy writing. She is a deaf author, but because she is the only real protagonist in the movie, she has to hold her own against a deranged killer. Maddie had to do this for at least the majority of the movie and it becomes a bit unbelievable when you take a step back and look at what this character has gone through. However, there are a few moments where the lack of realism is distracting.

She treats her own wounds, and powers through those injuries. Maddie is somehow able to hold her own against someone who supposedly hunts people for sport, and she does so as if she is in a war zone. What bothered me about this was that the writers never used her hearing impairment to her advantage. Instead, the character is not only a deaf author, but she is also Rambo. The worst part is, this seemed to be turned off and on whenever it was convenient for the writers to do so. In some scenes she has a really smart survival instinct, in others, this is turned off. Which way it went depended entirely on what the writers needed in order to move the plot along.


Pro: The Man (+5pts)

I was relieved when we got very little character development for the man in this movie. Too often, especially in horror movies today, the writers seem to think that the viewers need an elaborate origin story that explains who the antagonist is and why they are doing what they are doing. Too often, this origin story ruins the antagonist by shedding light on the monster in the dark. We have heard this saying since we were kids “people fear what they do not understand“.

With that in mind, why is it so hard for writers to understand this concept? Are there some antagonists that benefit from extensive character development? Yes, but there are many that benefit from having the backstory left untold. In Hush, the writers never explain why the man is doing what he is doing aside from telling us that he likes to hunt people for sport.

What is his name? How did his parents treat him as a child? Why does he like hunting and killing people? Who cares? None of these questions are answered because they do not need to be. This character worked so well because the audience does not understand him.


Con: Dumb Decisions (-4pts)

Similarly to the writers resorting to lazy writing by having Maddie be a surprise badass, the writers also resorted to lazy writing by having characters also make dumb decisions in order to move the story in the desired direction. The writers had two characters at point A and needed them to get to point B. In this scenario, they can not get to point B with a naturally progressing story that respects the two characters and their intelligence. With that, the writers had forced themselves into a predicament.

What do the writers do in a scenario like that? Just have the man climb up to a patiently waiting Maddie, place the crossbow at her feet and then proceed to climb the rest of the way up (allowing Maddie to get the crossbow). This behavior does not make sense for someone who supposedly hunts people. It is just one example, but there are plenty more examples from both characters throughout the story.

Grading Scale


Grade: C+ (79pts)

Hush was a movie with a very fascinating premise and a strong setup, but was unable maintain the fascinating nature of its premise throughout the entire story. The movie loses something once Maddie figures out what is going on. What started as a creepy thriller with the compelling twist of the main character being deaf, ends up turning into more of a mildly intense action movie with little to no plot and an under-utilized concept of the main character being deaf. There is basically two movies in one: the movie before Maddie discovers what is going on (the movie people want to see), and the movie after she learns what is going on.

Katie Siegel does a great job of maintaining viewer interest through her performance. I was also pleasantly surprised that the filmmakers did not explain the antagonist. The man was just a crazy person and that was really all he needed to be. The movie is far from perfect and periodically resorts to lazy writing but it was a mildly entertaining movie. It did not live up to its potential, but it is not a bad movie to watch if you are trying to get into the Halloween spirit.


Tucker & Dale vs. Evil
Train to Busan
The Conjuring
Velvet Buzzsaw
Bird Box
In the Tall Grass
The Ritual
The Babysitter
Gerald's Game
Little Evil
14 Cameras
Hold the Dark
The Perfection
Would You Rather
The Eyes of My Mother
Green Room
Meet the Blacks
The Bar
Death Note
Yoga Hosers
The Invitation
13 Cameras
The Open House
I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, reelrundown.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)