'James and the Giant Peach' Does Not Need a Reboot

Updated on August 23, 2018
Disastrous Grape profile image

Ash has a bachelor's in English Lit. She loves analyzing fiction and obsessing over books, film, and television.

James and the Giant Peach is the Disney movie no one talks about (most people probably don't even know it's a Disney movie) so it's a bit baffling that Disney was considering a remake.

It's not a bad story. It's just a pretty standard story. It is pretty much formulaic children's fantasy fiction: a child becomes an orphan, is given to horrible relatives, and must find some magical way to escape.

I just described about every children's story ever written.

And yet, James and the Giant Peach is still a lovely story most people (myself included) enjoy.

James faces down his fear of the rhino.
James faces down his fear of the rhino.

Stories like this follow a forumla because they are basically the kid's version of the Hero's Journey aka the Monomyth.

The Hero always goes on a journey of some kind of self-improvement and self-discovery where they conquer the bad guy and save the damsel in distress.

The journey usually requires that the Hero's mentor should die, allowing them to step out on their own and prove their worth. In this case, the child's mentor is their parent. So the parents always have to die or otherwise be removed, leaving the child to prove their bravery by standing on their own.

When James' parents are removed, he is given replacement parents in the form of bugs. Bugs are probably the perfect replacement in this scenario: they are just bugs. They are competent enough to be good parents but not powerful enough to protect James, which allows him to maintain an active role in the adventure.

Unlike Coraline, James actually comes up with decent ideas and performs daring feats that move the plot along. This is the way a protagonist is supposed to behave, but I guess Selick and crew forgot that when making Coraline.

Hilariously enough, James and the Giant Peach the book was banned. Now people love the story so much, there are stage plays, musicals, and a twenty-year-old movie that might be in for a remake.

According to the stories, Roald Dahl was a horrible man who filled his books with blatant racism and sexism. But, ironically, his book was banned because of references to drugs and alcohol.

To hell with brown people and women. Just say no to drugs, kids!

But do we need to remake everything? Seriously? Is the creative well running so dry that we have to dig up these old films and slap new CGI on them?

When I took Film in college, my thesis was that it's impossible to remake a classic film. A classic film is a classic because it has the right film crew, the right director, the right actors, the right scenery and special effects that make it pull together into this one beautiful thing. And because this one beautiful thing relies on so many factors clicking into place to make it perfect, it is impossible to replicate.

So in order to remake James and the Giant Peach, we would need a director, crew, special effects, voice actors and actresses, scenery . . . We would need all of that to be equal or better than what was done before.

It can't be replicated. It just can't.

You can not replace the likes of Richard Dreyfuss, who voiced Centipede. Or Susan Sarandon, who voiced Miss Spider.

Or Joanna Lumley of Absolutely Fabulous fame, who played the role of James' horrible Aunt Spiker. Or Miriam Margolyes (Romeo and Juliet) who played Aunt Sponge.

And good luck replacing the magical voice and acting of Pete Postlethwaite (another Romeo and Juliet star), who played the Old Man/ Magic Man and also narrated the film.

And aside from the actors and actresses, there's also the director, Henry Selick, and the film crew. You can look but you won't find replacements.

You simply won't find people who can make this film just as heartwarming and entertaining as it was before. Because to do that requires the exact factors that made the film good in the first place.

This is exactly why The BFG -- another Roald Dahl remake -- flopped two years ago.

Why keep making the same damn film over and over??? I think even Roald Dahl would be against this repetitive nonsense and would probably point people to one of his other books that sorely need attention.

Or maybe he'd just cackle and roll in all the piles of money.

What do I know anyway? I got a D for that paper.

© 2018 Ash


Submit a Comment

No comments yet.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, reelrundown.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)